The "BRIDE OF CHRIST" IS NOT THE CHURCH
74The Bride of Christ
4 Things that Bother Me About the "Bride of Christ" Teaching... YEA! EVEN 5!
1. Revelation 21:9-10 clearly states that the "the bride, the Lamb's wife" is the Holy Jerusalem.
2. If the Church were "the bride, the Lamb's wife" then that angel would have shown him "the Church", not the Holy Jerusalem. - Rev. 21:9-10
3. Jesus did not teach that his body is also his bride. Paul didn't teach it either.
4. If the church is "the bride of Christ" then the Christian has to do something to get "herself ready". Rev 19:7 says, "Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honour to him: for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and his wife hath made herself ready." This requires "works" to be done by the Christian to get ready. The word says that we are already made righteous, and are already sanctified. So then, the church, in God's eyes, is already ready. Rev 19:7 can't be refering to the church. It has to be something else.
5. Christians are repeatedly called "sons of God", "the body of Christ" and "the church" throughout the New Testament but are never called "the bride of Christ".
===============================================================
The main pillar in this teaching is that the church as the "bride of Christ" must MAKE HERSELF READY. This teaching is inconsistent with the entire Pauline Revelation of the Gospel of Grace.
Check it out...
Because of the FREE gift of grace, we are already righteous and without spot and blemish in the Lord's sight. We are already ready! It stands to reason that the church can't be the one "getting herself ready". It has to be something or someone else! It has to be that the "bride" is not the church and is, in fact, the holy Jerusalem just as the Word of God says it is. (Rev 21:9-12)
THE UNFORTUNATE "Bride of Christ" DOCTRINE
The "Bride of Christ" teaching says the church has to do something to make "herself ready", to be perfect. If this is true then there is absolutely no way Jesus will ever return and get us. We can't get "ready" ourselves out of our own doing something to be perfect. It'll never happen. We are not perfect and we can never be perfect outside of his gift of righteousness. It is just not possible. It will never be possible!
CAN'T IGNORE IT
I want to keep in mind though, that I don't believe we can ignore the marriage comparison of our relationship to God in the covenants, promises or vows made to each other. The word does make those comparisons. I don't refute that. God has made a lot of promises to us just like we make promises to each other when we get married. But as far as my personal relationship with God? I am a friend of God, He is my dad and I am His son too. "...whereby we cry abba (literally: "daddy"), father". Our closeness and intimacy with Him, is like a dad and not like that of a spouse. He is a dad who has promised me an inheritance and the ability to come boldy to His throne of grace.
JESUS NEVER PREACHED IT. PAUL NEVER PREACHED IT. They did not tell us the body of Christ is a bride of any kind. Perhaps Israel is the bride but the body of Christ isn't.
Jesus never told His disciples He would someday be their bride. Paul didn't say we are the bride. In fact nowhere in scriptures does it ever say Christians are the bride of Christ. Not only that, it just seems strange.
NO SUCH THING AS THE TERM "BRIDE OF CHRIST" IN THE BIBLE
We can find a "Lambs' Wife" but no "Bride of Christ". I searched the Bible for the term "bride of Christ". I couldn't find it. It suprised me when I did that search and came up with no results! And to think, after all these years of hearing how we are the bride of Christ and He will come get us once we have made ourselves ready.
WHAT DOES THE BIBLE SAY ABOUT THE "BRIDE OF CHRIST"?
What does the word say about the "bride of Christ"? Nothing really. The term "bride of Christ" is nowhere in the Bible. Aside from being first coined by the Roman Catholic Church, this term has been invented out of perceived inferences of certain passages that says God's relationship to us is "as a bride". These passages are all PARABLES or SIMILES. They are simply making a comparison of our relationship to Him as far as how much he loves us as well as His covenant promises to us. He made a covenant with His own just as I have made a covenant with my wife.
NOTICE THE TERM "BRIDE OF CHRIST" IS NOT USED
"And there came unto me one of the seven angels which had the seven vials full of the seven last plagues, and talked with me, saying, Come hither, I will shew thee the bride, the Lamb's wife. And he carried me away in the spirit to a great and high mountain, and shewed me that great city, the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God, Having the glory of God: and her light was like unto a stone most precious, even like a jasper stone, clear as crystal; And had a wall great and high, and had twelve gates, and at the gates twelve angels, and names written thereon, which are the names of the twelve tribes of the children of Israel:.." Rev. 21:9-12
This passage does not say the body of Christ is the the Lamb's wife. It does not say Israel is the Lamb's wife. It clearly states however that "that great city, the holy Jerusalem" is the Lamb's wife. In verse 10 it also says that John the Revelator saw that great city descending down from heaven adorned as a bride. He doesn't even refer to it as the bride but that it is adorned as a bride.
Rev 21:9-10 "And there came unto me one of the seven angels which had the seven vials full of the seven last plagues, and talked with me, saying, Come hither, I will shew thee the bride, the Lamb's wife. And he carried me away in the spirit to a great and high mountain, and shewed me that great city, the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God,"
TAKING GRACE AWAY
Rev 19:7 says: "Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honour to him: for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and his wife hath made herself ready."
It isn't that this scripture is teaching to take away grace it is the people who preach the church/bride concept that are undermining grace, whether knowingly or unknowingly. Since they believe the church is the "bride" then by default they have to preach that the church is getting herself ready and be without spot and blemish before the Lord comes to get us in order to be consistent with Rev 19:7. If the "bride" is the church then the church has to get herself ready according to Rev 19:7. Thats just not the way it is though.
=================================================================
One of the disturbing things here is that neither of the following stories on which the "bride of Christ" doctrine is built even mention a bride. But the proponents of this doctrine do make the ridiculous leap to this being about a "bride of Christ"!
=================================================================
READ THIS PARABLE AGAIN...
A bride is not a subject in this story. The guests are the subject. ...and besides, how can the guests be considered the bride?
Taking the leap from the guests representing "the bride of Christ" can't be done but the proponents of the bride/christ concept do it here!
This story is about how Israel rejected Jesus as the Messiah so, God sent the gospel of grace to the Gentiles.
Rom 1:16 "For I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek."
At best, today's church could be represented here as a guest at the wedding...
Matt 22:1-14 And Jesus answered and spake unto them again by parables, and said, The kingdom of heaven is like unto a certain king, which made a marriage for his son, And sent forth his servants to call them that were bidden to the wedding: and they would not come. Again, he sent forth other servants, saying, Tell them which are bidden, Behold, I have prepared my dinner: my oxen and my fatlings are killed, and all things are ready: come unto the marriage. But they made light of it, and went their ways, one to his farm, another to his merchandise: And the remnant took his servants, and entreated them spitefully, and slew them. But when the king heard thereof, he was wroth: and he sent forth his armies, and destroyed those murderers, and burned up their city. Then saith he to his servants, The wedding is ready, but they which were bidden were not worthy. Go ye therefore into the highways, and as many as ye shall find, bid to the marriage. So those servants went out into the highways, and gathered together all as many as they found, both bad and good: and the wedding was furnished with guests. And when the king came in to see the guests, he saw there a man which had not on a wedding garment: And he saith unto him, Friend, how camest thou in hither not having a wedding garment? And he was speechless. Then said the king to the servants, Bind him hand and foot, and take him away, and cast him into outer darkness; there shall be weeping and gnashing of teeth. For many are called, but few are chosen.
...AND READ THIS PARABLE AGAIN TOO
It goes without saying that the ten virgins are not this groom's wife. They are only guests trying to get into the wedding.
Once again, taking the leap from the ten virgins being guests to being the bride and representing "the bride of Christ" can't be done but the proponents of the bride/christ concept do it here!
This story is about being ready to be accepted into the kingdom of heaven. How is that done? By accepting Jesus as our lord.
That story is as simple as that and that is all there is to it!...
Matt 25:1-13 Then shall the kingdom of heaven be likened unto ten virgins, which took their lamps, and went forth to meet the bridegroom. And five of them were wise, and five were foolish. They that were foolish took their lamps, and took no oil with them: But the wise took oil in their vessels with their lamps. While the bridegroom tarried, they all slumbered and slept. And at midnight there was a cry made, Behold, the bridegroom cometh; go ye out to meet him. Then all those virgins arose, and trimmed their lamps. And the foolish said unto the wise, Give us of your oil; for our lamps are gone out. But the wise answered, saying, Not so; lest there be not enough for us and you: but go ye rather to them that sell, and buy for yourselves. And while they went to buy, the bridegroom came; and they that were ready went in with him to the marriage: and the door was shut. Afterward came also the other virgins, saying, Lord, Lord, open to us. But he answered and said, Verily I say unto you, I know you not. Watch therefore, for ye know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of man cometh.
THEN THERE IS ISAIAH 62...
Isa 62:4 Thou shalt no more be termed Forsaken; neither shall thy land any more be termed Desolate: but thou shalt be called Hephzi-bah, and thy land Beulah: for the LORD delighteth in thee, and thy land shall be married.
Some have said He won't marry a city but here the Lord is married to the land so, as in Rev 21:9-10 He can be married to a city if He wants. What difference is that to us? God can do what He wants to do whether we understand it or not. After all, when did God ever do anything that really made sense to us?
...AND JEREMIAH 3:14
Jer 3:14 "Turn, O backsliding children, saith the LORD; for I am married unto you: and I will take you one of a city, and two of a family, and I will bring you to Zion:"
Once again the prophet is addressing Israel and not the church. There was no church yet. Furthermore, the prophet says God is ALREADY married to Israel! So, maybe there is not a wedding in heaven later but only a marriage supper since there is no mention of a wedding for Jesus... hmmm.
=================================================================
WHY DO WE ALWAYS READ THINGS INTO THE WORD?
So, how did some miss that passage and turn the church or even Israel into the "bride of Christ"? Israel makes more sense but still I'm not sure why people draw conclusions like these without clear evidence. My guess is it has something to do with trying to figure out the marriage supper of the Lamb. As humans I think we tend to want to understand everything so we just read stuff into things that aren't really there in order to make some sort of sense out of it.
PREACHERS AREN'T ALWAYS RIGHT
Just because somebody in the pulpit says it, that doesn't make it true. The word of God has to clearly, come right out and say it for it to be true unless it otherwise says so. Such as when Jesus said He was telling a parable. If that is what Jesus did then we can expect that is what God did when He inspired the Bible's writers.
WHAT THE "Bride of Christ" DOCTRINE TEACHES
The "bride of Christ" doctrine tells us once we "stand up and have all the wrinkles out of our wedding dress" then we will be ready (that comes from the scripture that says "..once the bride hath made herself ready..."). It tells us the Lord will return and get us once we "make ourselves ready", are without "spot or blemish" and when the church is perfect and ready. I must have heard that come from the pulpit a hundred times. Nothing can be further from the truth.
BEING READY IS A GIFT
You see, being perfect is a gift and it is a gift we already have. Sorry, but the last time I read 2 Cor. 5:21, Romans 3:26, 1 Cor 1:30, and 2 Cor 9:10 it says we have been made the righteousness of God already. We are already without "spot or blemish". We are already perfect and righteous. Jesus can return now if God tells Him to. He can return at anytime. More importantly is the fact that if we are made righteous through the blood of Jesus then it takes away from us "the works" that we will have to do to become perfect. It makes it all about grace again and not something we do on our own. It makes it all about his ability to save us and His ability working in us to give us the power to overcome sin in our own lives. This is the fundamental reason Jesus gave His life for us. "The bride" teaching removes the fundamental purpose in the plan of salvation. Our salvation becomes about works and about making ourselves perfect and ready. Grace is denied. Its by grace we are saved and it will be by grace that He will return and get His church. (Eph. 2).
RIGHTEOUSNESS IS THE PURPOSE OF GOD'S PLAN FOR MAN
The entire purpose of God in sending His son as a sacrifice for the sins of the world was to give us His righteousness. He came to make us righteous. Without His righteousness we cannot be in his presence and have a personal relationship with Him right now. Do we understand the depth and magnitude of being made righteous? We have been made righteous! Righteousness is the primary work of the New Birth. We are already righteous and perfect and without spot or blemish as far as God is concerned. We don't have to do a thing to become perfect. We already are. His grace working in us is what makes us worthy and deserving of all God has for us. My righteousness is "as filthy rags". Whatever good things I do are still not good enough. Why? because, as Paul said, ...sin is waring in my members". That means my own good works are still tainted. But on the other hand, you see, once I have received "the abundance of grace", through faith, I become righteous with God's perfect, glorious and bright shining righteousness. That is the righteousness that holy Jerusalem's (the lamb's wife) garment is made of. So, now then, Jesus can return any time now and get us. We don't have to get all the "spots and blemishes" out first. Jesus' work on the cross already did that.
CHRISTIANITY BECOMES LIKE ALL THE OTHER RELIGIONS OF THE WORLD
I used to think the "bride of Christ" doctrine was a secondary issue in Christianity but with further consideration I've found it is not. It is a primary issue. What it teaches causes us to find ourselves doing works to become "without spot or wrinkle". Our Christianity becomes just like all the rest of the religions of the world. It becomes a religion of works and not one founded in God's grace. The "Bride of Christ" teaching takes away from us God's grace and gift of righteousness. We then become all about works. The Galations were all about works. What did Paul call those Galations? He called them fools.
ANOTHER PROBLEM THAT COULD BE IN THIS DOCTRINE
In addition to quashing the gift of righteousness by the "Bride of Christ' doctrine, our understanding of our authority and position in Christ is effected as well. Being in his body is much more powerful than the position and authority we might have as a bride.
For example, when it comes right down to it, my wife is limited in her authority. I can delegate my authority to her but she can never have my total authority. It's not that way with the body of Christ. He gave us all of His authority as kings and priests in the earth. We are his body. We have His authority in the earth. That authority is the Word of God He gave us to hear, believe, speak and live by in order to do what the first Adam didn't. That is to subdue the earth and replenish it. We get the earth back from satan.
DON'T BELIEVE ANYTHING YOU HEAR (INCLUDING WHAT I WRITE) UNLESS IT CAN BE CLEARLY BACKED UP BY THE WORD
I can clearly backup, with scripture, the fact that the Lamb's wife is the holy city of Jerusalem. But the ones who believe the church is the bride of Christ cannot back it up with obvious scripture.
RECONSIDERING DOCTRINE
Its good to question everything we are being taught. I have always been puzzled by this teaching. The word says in heaven we don't marry. "But they which shall be accounted worthy to obtain that world, and the resurrection from the dead, neither marry, nor are given in marriage:" Luke 20:35. I don't think this verse has much to do with the "bride of Christ" doctrine yet, on second thought, maybe it does. Since there is no limiting language in this scripture. If Luke 10:35 says we won't be given in marriage then can it even be possible to be married to Jesus or anyone else for that matter, in the hereafter? Anyway, that scripture is what started me questioning all this.
BRIDE OF CHRIST ORIGINS
The term "Bride of Christ" has it roots in the Roman Catholic Church. You probably know the clergy or priests of the Roman Catholic Church "marries" their church, taking a oath to celebacy. As a result, the term "Bride of Christ" was eventually coined in relation to this practice. Today, this concept and terminology has spilled over into our own fundamental Christian doctrines.
THE PLAY "THE BRIDE"
Several years ago (early 90's) there was a play called "The Bride". This play told a story of how the church is the "bride of Christ". This play was performed in many cities in the US. It was a nice little drama but it is unscriptural. In spite of that, the body of Christ, once again went for it and made it a doctrinal pillar.
IT SOUNDS GOOD
All this sounded good so somehow this doctrine got into what is being preached today. Just because the doctrine sounds good doesn't mean its God. Don't believe a thing just because at first glace it makes sense. If its not clearly in the word, its not so.
OUR RELATIONSHIP TO GOD IS A COVENANT RELATIONSHIP
I don't believe we should throw out notion that we have a similar relationship to God as a husband would have to his wife in covenant only. That is, in light of the promises and covenants we make with our spouse in marriage. Those are similar to the ones Jesus makes to us in the promises of the New Covenant.
THE PERSONAL RELATIONSHIP WE HAVE WITH GOD
In the concept of "intimacy" with God in a personal relationship with Him, it is like that of a son to his dad. We are also called a friend of God. We became the sons of God when Jesus laid down His life for us. Now we call God "dad".
I SEARCHED THE BIBLE FOR "BRIDE OF CHRIST"
As I was finding out for myself what the word really says about this, I looked up the following terminologies in concordances; "bride of Christ", "the bride", "bride", and "wife". I read every reference to these as well as looked up what the original Hebrew/Greek meanings of these words are and here's what I discovered.
First of all I found tons of verses in the word saying we are the body of Christ and the church, but on the other hand, there are only a handful about any bride relationship God might have to us and those don't come out and plainly state we are the "bride of Christ". I was really surprised that I didn't find in any reference where it clearly stated the church or the body of Christ is the "bride of Christ". In fact I couldn't find the term "bride of Christ" in the Bible at all! I couldn't find it anywhere! WOW! And after hearing all these years about the church being the "bride of Christ"!
INFERRENCES DON'T ESTABLISH TRUTH
This thing about us being "the "bride of Christ"" can only be inferred! Building doctrines on inferrences will mess us up and get us off the truth. This is the reason the Jones followers got off and drank the kool-aid. I don't know about you but I'm not going with any doctrine that is inferred.
For example, It can be inferred that the baptism of the Holy Spirit was for the early church only and that God doesn't operate that way today. For centuries the church, by and large, had been robbed of the comfort, revelation, ability and power found in the baptism of the Holy Spirit. I'm glad we don't believe that's true anymore.
Also consider that "the church" once believed women shouldn't be in ministry or pastoring or in any leadership positions. That misconception came out inferences taken out of the word too. We don't accept those two inferences as truth anymore yet we will accept inferences when it comes to the bride teaching. I find that an inconsistent approach to figuring out the truth in the word.
In interpreting the word, I take the word literally for what it says unless it specifically says otherwise. For instance, Jesus told many stories that had meanings and were similes. Before He told His stories, He always let the hearer know He was about to tell a parable before He told it.
A FEW MORE SCRIPTURES THAT HAVE BEEN MISINTERPRETED
Now then, the following scriptures make only a relationship comparison but they don't say we are the "bride of Christ". Also notice the topic of discussion is about husbands and wives, not a bride. The topic is about a husband and a wife. Nothing here relates to Jesus as having the church as a bride. In fact it clearly says Jesus is the head of the church.
"Wives, submit yourselves unto your own husbands, AS unto the Lord"
"For the husband is the head of the wife, even AS Christ is the head of the church"(vs. 23).
"For no man ever yet hated his own flesh; but nourisheth and cherisheth it, even AS the Lord the church" (vs. 29).
The apostle, by using a simile instead of a metaphor is desiring to show the resemblance between the marriage relationship and Christ and the Church. Paul points to the love relationship to demonstrate that "as Christ loved the Church," husbands should love their wives. In like manner, wives are to emulate the Church by submitting to their own husbands. Nowhere in the portion under consideration does the apostle use the metaphor of a bride. In fact, just the opposite is true: ". . . and He is the Savior of the BODY" (vs. 23). "For we are members of His BODY, of His flesh, and of His bones" (vs. 30).
"For I am jealous over you with godly jealousy: for I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you AS a chaste virgin to Christ" (11 Cor. 11:2). This is a simile and not a metaphor. It does not say the church is the "bride of Christ".
"FINALLY BRETHEREN WHATSOVER THINGS ARE...TRUE"
Until it can be unquestionably proved that we, the body of Christ are "the "bride of Christ", I don't plan on building a message, doctrine, or ministry around it or writing any books about it. I'm going to continue walking in His grace and maintaining a righteousness consciousness. I'm playing it safe on this one and just referring to all of us as the "body of Christ".
vote upvote downshareprintflag
- Useful (16)
- Funny (1)
- Awesome (4)
- Beautiful (3)
- Interesting (1)
CommentsLoading...
<<The concern I have is that the bride of Christ doctrine teaches us to get ourselves "ready" and to get ourselves where we are "without spot or blemish".>>
Matthew 5:48 Be ye therefore perfect, even as your Father which is in heaven is perfect.
It seems like Jesus is really expecting us to obey His commandments in perfect manner. Although many times we fail (I KNOW I do all the time), I think we should strive for perfection. There is a difference in doing good works and trusting in your own self-righteousness for salvation.
The Bride of Christ is written about many times:
Ephesians 5:25-27 Husbands, love your wives, even as Christ also loved the church, and gave himself for it; That he might sanctify and cleanse it with the washing of water by the word, That he might present it to himself a glorious church, not having spot, or wrinkle, or any such thing; but that it should be holy and without blemish.
2 Corinthians 11:1-3 (Paul speaking to the church)Would to God ye could bear with me a little in my folly: and indeed bear with me. For I am jealous over you with godly jealousy: for I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you as a chaste virgin to Christ. But I fear, lest by any means, as the serpent beguiled Eve through his subtlety, so your minds should be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.
I just wanted to say .. THANK YOU CDA!! My spirit is right now rejoicing with the truth! Hallelujah! I was reading the Word one day when God pointed out to me the passage talking about the New Jerusalem being the bride. I was so blown away at first (since I had always assumed that the church was the bride). But, it all began to eventually make sense.. New Jerusalem and the bridegroom and such. Jesus cannot marry His own body and the Word tells us umpteen times that we are the body of Christ. I think most of the passages written on marriage are conveying a message on "committing". Committing ourselves to God and His Word and not the things of this world. Thanks again .. gosh, it is tough to find others that accept what you have explained here (which is supported by the Word of God). God bless!
The church is not the bride. You have this right. We are already ONE with Jesus NOW. If people believe they are the bride, then using His name now and being intimate with Him NOW, is spiritual fornication. We give away our birthright as Esau did, when we declare ourselves as bride. We are the BODY and the BODY ONLY. Jesus is coming back to get his BODY and take us to the bride, New Jerusalem, where we will become a part of the city. The scriptures that teach about this are amazing.
You know, I have always wondered what are the dangers (besides the ones already listed here) in believing the Bride of Christ doctrine.
CDA said .. Being in his body is much more powerful than the position and authority we might have as a bride...
On another blog site that I joined, there is a blog that has caused a great deal of controversy. It is basically about how the churches of today are effeminate in nature. This results in Christians being more in touch with their feelings than with the Word of God. It seems this "Bride of Christ" doctrine may be the spirit behind the church's feminism. And this would most definitely result in a loss of both power and persuasion.
Great point Debra.
Remember that we are not to be moved by our feelings but are to respond to what the word of God says.
I might feel like I am not saved on one day and then feel like I am saved on another. My feelings are meaningless here. I am saved because the word of God says I am and not because my feelings say so.
Do you believe in the Trinity? I can't find that term in the Bible either,... do all your search engines and you want find it!!! But the theology is difinently there and one of foundational truth. This is the same truth as the bride of Christ, it is there but it takes discernment to understand it! In the last chapter of the Revelation of Jesus Christ, He tells John it is the "Spirit and the bride who say Come", note it's not the Church. When Paul writes of the relationship of Husband and wife he quotes Genesis 2:24 and says that this mystery of man becoming one flesh in marriage really pertains to God and Man. This is why Paul said in Corintians that we should not join ourselves with a harlot because the two become one flesh but rather we should join ourselves with the Lord. 1 Corinthians 6:16-17. Yes, the bride makes herself ready, Rev.19:7, she is purified by the flame of the love of God, the church needs refining by the fire of persecution. Rev 3:15-20 more at www.unveilingthebride.com
To understand the Christ and His bride one must look at the what God has foreshadowed in the Old Testament. Without arguement we know that the 7 feasts of the Lord foreshadowed the life of Christ to a tee. He literally fulfilled the feasts on their celebrated days. At least the first 4, the last 3 will be literally fulfilled in His 2nd coming. You said above, "We have to think this through... If the church is Christ's body, then we are part of Christ. That makes us the husband to the bride and not the bride. That is not possible. If Jesus is the head and the church is his body how can Jesus marry his own body? Thats crazy! Coming to think about it in these terms makes the "Bride of Christ" doctrine really stupid. Jesus isn't going to marry his own body. He will marry his wife. The only thing he can marry will be the "Lamb's Wife". And that is the Holy Jerusalem" Since Christ is the last Adam 1 Cor. 15:45, we only need to look at the first Adam to see the Bride. Out of the Body of Adam came forth a Bride. Does that sound crazy? But even Adam acknowledge that out of himself came forth a Bride saying, "This is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh, she will be called woman because she was taken out of Man." Gen. 2:23. Yes, the bride will be taken out of the body of Christ just as it happened with the first Adam. Adam willingly was put to sleep a shadow of Christ on the Cross, so that he could obtain a bride. Blood was shed and spilled when God took from Adam's side a part of his body to bring forth a bride for Adam. One of the words Jesus spoke on the cross is Aramic for bride. Saying it is finished, "Kalah" a play on words to mean complete, finished, and bride. Therefore when God brought the Women to Adam He said, "For this cause a man shall leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave to his wife, and the shall become one, i.e. complete!!!! Gen 2:24 the Scriptures are full of this knowledge, I pray you and the others come to the awesome experience of knowing the desire God has for you beyond servanthood, You have be called to be His Wife! I know no other honor than that.
The church IS the body of Christ and not the bride. So, you are right... Christ can't marry His own body. That is crazy and another reason that the bride of Christ doctrine is error.
The bride comes out of the Church. Just like the bride came out of Adam. Not all of Adam was the bride. Note that God didn't create Eve from the earth as He did Adam. But took a rib out of the body of Adam, not his whole body. The whole Church is not the bride, only those who answer the call. Jesus made this evident in His discourse on the mount of Olivet, in regards to His disciples question about the end, Matt. 24. In Matt 25:1-10 he compares the end and the kingdom to those who were ready for the wedding, 5 were foolish and 5 were ready. Those foolish missed the call to be the bride. It has nothing to do with salvation but everything to do with "being holy even as He is Holy". In other words they gave up adultry with the world which many in the church have not done. They can be seen in the Church at Thyatria see Rev 2:18-23. Others are like the Church at Laodicea thinking themselves rich and wealthy in God but He says of them you do not know that you are wretched and miserable and poor and blind and naked. They are Lukewarm and are spit out of His mouth. Rev. 3:14-20. The bride have the attitude as David, they pant after God even as the deer pants after the water. They desire one Thing, to dwell in the presence of God and gaze at His beauty.Ps63
This is the exhortation of Holiness, "As obedient children, do not be conformed to the FORMER lusts which were yours in your ignorance but like the HOLY ONE who called you, be holy yourselves also in all your BEHAVIOR" 1 Peter 1:14-15 There is a doctrine of godliness. 1 Timothy6:3 If not then Christ had no right to rebuke 5 out of the 7 Churches in Rev.2 & 3
True, we are to lead godly lives. BUT my rghteousness is as filthy rags. So Jesus gave us His righteousness as a gift. Therefore we are already ready and perfect in the sight of God. We all still have the old nature at war in our flesh. Paul even said that. He said that there was a war in our members (the caral man). He said that he didn't do the things fhe should do and the things he didn't want do he should do. He was discussing trying to "get the body under" the rule of the born again spirit. He also went on to say that "what then sin and put Christ to the cross again? God forbid but if we do sin we have an advocate with the Father and He is quick to forgive us of our sins and cleanse us of all unrighteousnes. I am not advocating taking advantage of salvation but we have His righteousness no matter what. In God's eyes we are perfect. We are already ready for Him. If we weren't we wouldn't be able to go to heaven now when we die. We are in the dispensation of UNMERITED favor and grace.
Friend, you are right in the concept that we are made holy by the sacrifice of Christ alone, not our own efforts that none may boast. However, the Bible clearly calls the church the BRIDEGROOM, the betrothed, the soon to be bride of Christ. We are made perfect through His blood and we have been presented to Him as pure. Jesus promised the church He would prepare a place, then return for His Betrothed. Until then, the church is to wait in anticipation of the Groom. “I am going there to prepare a place for you. 3And if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come back and take you to be with Me that you also may be where I am. 4You know the way to the place where I am going."”.When Jesus said “This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many," he said to them. "I tell you the truth, I will not drink again of the fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it anew in the kingdom of God.” He was referring to the marriage supper, the permanent joining of the church to Christ. So, true the church is not the Bride, it is the betrothed and we are to be faithful to His promise. He will return for us and we say come quickly Lord Jesus.
Your confusion with salvation and making oneself ready is key to seeing the difference in the bride and the church. Israel after applying the blood on the door post and being saved from the death angel escaped God's judgement. They found themselves delivered by the mighty hand of God and not by their own power or merit, simple grace. But Levi seperated himself from the gross immorality in which his brothers engaged. As a result God brought them closer to Himself. Why were they chosen? Because of what they had done!Ex.32:26-28. Answer this in the parable of the 10 virgins who all went out to meet the bridegroom why were 5 left out of the wedding. If it is by grace alone? The world is not looking for the bridegroom nor or they in any since a virgin. These who went out were looking for Jesus. They waited, yet 5 were not ready! This is fact and Jesus preached it. Revelation makes it clear the bride made herself ready!!!! I didn't write this Jesus did, it is the Revelation of Jesus which God gave Him to convey to His servant. Reve 1:1
In Rev It says, the bride made herself ready and it was given to her to wear fine linen which is the righteous acts of the saints, Rev 19:7-8. Then in Rev. 19:14 the armies in heaven who where dressed in fine linen came riding on white horses with Christ back to earth. Are you saying, those who are dressed in fine linen are not the bride and that the army riding on white horses is really the city "The New Jerusalem" even though they are defined by the white linen they wear? Now that is a confusing simile. Can you help eplain how a city rides on horses because I understand it to mean the bride in "fine linen" who is the army of God came back with Him on horses to wage war with Satan.
Back again .. hehe. This is an interesting topic for me and I come here often to see what else might be posted. Now, this is just an opinion but it makes sense to me.
The Bible always exalts Jesus Christ. He is first in everything. Agreed? If the church were truly the 'bride of Christ', wouldn't this be exalting the church? Or going against the order that God has set in place? ... God, Jesus, Holy Spirit, Man, Woman, and so forth.
Instead of giving us an image of the church being the bride, wouldn't the Word of God give us an image of Jesus Christ being the husband? Wouldn't it be more appropriate to refer to Jesus as the husband as opposed to referring to the church as the bride?
Just a thought ..
In Hosea 2:16 God Himself says this, "In that day," declares the LORD, "you will call me 'my husband';
you will no longer call me 'my master.NIV This day is still coming to pass especially now. However many still call Jesus Master and don't know Him as Husband. But he declares the day will come when some of His people will understand who He really is. He goes on to make a promise in Hosea 2:18-19, "I will betroth you to me forever; I will betroth you in righteousness and justice, in love and compassion.
I will betroth you in faithfulness, and then you will know the LORD". The word betroth means to promise to marry, Strongs #781, look it up. God has never broken a promise nor does He lie, Titus 1:2 "which God, who cannot lie, promised long ages ago.."NASU The second witness of God keeping His promise is preached by Paul saying, 2 Cor 11:2,"I promised you to one husband, to Christ, so that I might present you as a pure virgin to him.NIV The word promised is the Greek word for espoused,i.e. in marriage. Strongs # 718. Paul warns those who do not see this truth of Christ being thier husband. 2 Cor 11:3-4 "But I am afraid that just as Eve was deceived by the serpent's cunning, your minds may somehow be led astray from your sincere and pure devotion to Christ" NIV Futhermore, when Jesus was asked this question, "Luke 5:33
"John's disciples often fast and pray, and so do the disciples of the Pharisees, but yours go on eating and drinking." NIV Guess what kind of answer He gives them, "Luke 5:34-35 Can you make the guests of the bridegroom fast while he is with them? 35 But the time will come when the bridegroom will be taken from them; in those days they will fast." NIV Why answer them in such a way. Because He was here on earth preparing and propessing to His bride, otherwise, He would of gave them their religious answer!!!!!!!!!!!!!! He is at least "MY HUSBAND"
By the way show me at least one verse in the Old Testament that says God would raise up a Church! You can't does that mean your religion is FALSE? But I continue to show you the Scriptures that speak of the Bride and you can't see it! Dancing around the truth because of what? I know but that job is left to His Spirit. You love the word simile. So when Paul says we are God's Building 1 Cor 3,then we understand that we are not a building but like it. When compared to stones and a spiritual house we see that we have the functions of a house and its stones. When Revelations says I'll show the bride it doesn't directly say the city is the bride it say he took me to a mountain and showed me the New Jerusalem coming out of the Sky. We know that a bride is truely a city but is like a city a true definition of a simile but this is the only place you dare not use it. But really know need because he did not say it was the bride. In Rev. 21:2 he compares the City as a bride, that is a simile to the 2nd degree. Plus this happens a 1,000 years later after the marriage supper of the lamb in Rev. 19. Funny the marriage takes place before the bride arrives 1,000 years later according to your doctrine!!!
Jesus Christ, by His blood, has cleansed all true believers from their wicked sin.
But, you missed something....
James 1:27
God commands that we NOT become "spotted" by the things OF THIS WORLD. Why? Because we believers must stand before the "Judgment Seat of Christ." On that day, some will suffer loss because they did not heed Jesus' warning to His bride. Some will be rewarded for their faithfulness in keeping their robes from become "spotted by the things of this world."
Finally, Jesus Himself declares that He is coming for His bride. You make the connection.
There is always much debate about grace and works in regards to salvation. I don't believe it is as difficult as people want to make it. Everyone needs to take all the denominational agendas out and see it for what it is.
Without grace there is no salvation. By His Grace, Yahweh sent His Son Yahshua to die, and rise again for us. No salvation is possible without it.
BUT.
In saying that, we have to realize that once we understand and accept this kindness, this grace, we are a new person - a changed person who dies daily to the old self.
Our works are the good fruits of that grace.
If we don't have good fruits, good works, after receiving the grace - we are the seeds that fell on the stony path, or got tangled in the weeds.
Unlike the criminal on the pole beside Him when He died, we are still alive and well, and capable of doing good works associated with the grace. If we do not the good works, it only shows that we did not truly comprehend the grace, or we simply took advantage of it.
Good works are the proof we really believe the promise of salvation by grace. Without good works, we prove we did not believe the promise of salvation by grace - we merely wanted to be saved inorder to be our old selves.
If you would have asked me to see my bride, I would have taken you to the Church made of fine marble and cultured stone. We would go through the double doors carved with cherubim and inlaid with gold. We would walk through the foyer inlaid with cedar made from East Texas pine the work of a skilled craftsman. The doors leading to the sanctuary are twenty feet high and ten feet across and in them are carved every creature created by God. There also was engraved the twelve tribes of Israel and on them the names of the twelve apostles! Beyond the doors stood the alter in what appeared to be the throne of God for that is what we wanted, so as to speak our vows before His throne. This church was adorned as a bride prepared for her husband even his wife. And in it was all those who had been invited to witness my wedding for it was I who married the bride.
If you don't count yourself worthy to be the bride at least by His grace you can attend the wedding. Yes you there, by the way I'll be dressed in white with a veil over my face.
hi this is the second time i came across this hub and the first time i didnt comment because i wanted to find the answer before i commented. and to answer your question you are right we will never be perfect enough for god, but we are made in Gods image thats not the point the point is that the church being the bride of christ is more like a metophor meaning that since God is the churchs husband than he has to take care of us, provide for us, love us, like a husband provides for his wife and the church being Gods wife we have to live for him, support him in away, love him also, proverbs 31 explains how a wife should be to her husband so that is how the church should be to God. God doesnt want us to be perofect he just wants us to love him like you would love your worldly husbands
Here is your one verse: “For Zion's sake I will not keep silent, for Jerusalem's sake I will not remain quiet, till her righteousness shines out like the dawn, her salvation like a blazing torch. 2 The nations will see your righteousness, and all kings your glory; you will be called by a new name that the mouth of the LORD will bestow. 3 You will be a crown of splendor in the LORD's hand, a royal diadem in the hand of your God. 4 No longer will they call you Deserted, or name your land Desolate. But you will be called Hephzibah (My desire), and your land Beulah (Married); for the LORD will take delight in you, and your land will be married. 5 As a young man marries a maiden, so will your sons marry you; as a bridegroom rejoices over his bride, so will your God rejoice over you. Isa 62:1-5 NIV
You may say this pertains to Israel on the contrary this is what God has promised in Jeremiah 31:31-33, "The time is coming," declares the LORD, "when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah. 32 It will not be like the covenant I made with their forefathers when I took them by the hand to lead them out of Egypt, because they broke my covenant, though I was a husband to them," declares the LORD. 33 "This is the covenant I will make with the house of Israel after that time," declares the LORD. "I will put my law in their minds and write it on their hearts. I will be their God, and they will be my people”.
That covenant was a marriage contract even as God declared, “I was a husband to them”, Again Isaiah says of God, “As a young man marries a maiden, so will your sons marry you, as a bridegroom rejoices over his bride, so will your God rejoice over you”
This new covenant of marriage is what the New Testament saints declared in Hebrews 8:7-9, “For if there had been nothing wrong with that first covenant, no place would have been sought for another. 8 But God found fault with the people and said: "The time is coming, declares the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel
and with the house of Judah. 9 It will not be like the covenant I made with their forefathers when I took them by the hand to lead them out of Egypt, because they did not remain faithful to my covenant, and I turned away from them, declares the Lord”.
This is the new covenant Jesus made, “In the same way, after the supper he took the cup, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood, which is poured out for you” Luke 22:20 NIV. This was the fulfillment of Hosea 2:16, “In that day," declares the LORD,
"you will call me 'my husband'; you will no longer call me 'my master.'
How much more evidence do you need?
Then the new covenant doesn't pertain to you because it says I will make a New Covenant with the House of Israel and the House of Judah. Your lost in your sins according to your interpretations because without question it says this to Israel!!!!!!!!!1
I agree that we will never make ourselves without spot or blemish. I also agree that believers in Messiah are to be his body on earth.
We can't make ourselves into a worthy bride, but Messiah can. His sacrifice has made his servants (the church) without spot or blemish.
When he returns to earth, it will be in his actual body, his post-resurrection one. So I don't see a conflict with the church being his body for now.
The Bible does give us the concept of Messiah viewing the church as his bride. Paul says that husbands must love their wives as Christ loves the church.
Also, in Hebrew tradition, there is a ritual a man must follow when he wants to marry a woman. It includes pouring a cup of wine, and letting the woman choose to drink it or not. If she chooses, the man says "I go to prepare a place for you", and he builds a new room on his house to honor the bride. Jesus told the disciples "I go to prepare a place for you". The beautiful thing about this is that some fiances took a long time building the new room, especially if the room was extra luxurious. But the bride never really knew how long it would take for the fiance's return.
So yes, I wouldn't build a prescriptive theology around it, but the concept of Messiah claiming his church as his bride is there.
I have recently begun studying and questioning the reference scriptures above and agree there are comparisons to marriage and Christ being the husband of the church in the Pauline scriptures and I don't claim to be a bible scholar but, I also take the bible literally and I think we as believers are the guests, invited through grace to the wedding. I believe we are the body of Christ (a masculine term). As you said, in Revelation 21:9,10 the Lamb's wife is the great city, the holy Jerusalem and in verse 27 only those who are written in the Lamb's book of life can enter it (the city or the Lamb's bride). Revelation 22:17 says, the Spirit (the Holy Spirit) and the bride (the holy city) say, "Come!" And let him (who?) who hears say, "Come!"
Come where? Into the bride, that great city, The holy Jerusalem! I just can't see Christ marrying his own body either. Colossians 1:18 says, And He is the head of the body, the CHURCH.
Sorry for the misquote in Rev. 21:9 I meant the Lamb's bride.
Dear cda,
Thank you for the response to my posting.
I know a lot of believers that get blown away when I show them that Revelation 21:9 says the bride of the Lamb is the new Jerusalem. Then go back to the other passages, which are metaphors, to try to discount what the bible actually says. I'm like you. I can't find a single passage that SAYS the church or the body is the bride of Christ. I noticed some on this hub that oppose your views but, they have yet to come up with a scripture that supports their belief of the church or body being the bride without it being a metaphor or simile as you said. Why can't they take the Word literally for what it says? They even start doing word studies on the Hebrew and Greek translations to try to prove they are right and the bible is wrong!
What would happen if they read Galations 4:26, But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the MOTHER of us all? I'm looking forward to the response on this!
Jesus said this, in "John 6:54-60 He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood has eternal life, and I will raise him up on the last day. 55 "For My flesh is true food, and My blood is true drink. 56 "He who eats My flesh and drinks My blood abides in Me, and I in him. 57 "As the living Father sent Me, and I live because of the Father, so he who eats Me, he also will live because of Me. 58 "This is the bread which came down out of heaven; not as the fathers ate and died; he who eats this bread will live forever."
These things He said in the synagogue as He taught in Capernaum.
60 Therefore many of His disciples, when they heard this said, " This is a difficult statement; who can listen to it?" NASU
He went on to say, "John 6:63-64 It is the Spirit who gives life; the flesh profits nothing; the words that I have spoken to you are spirit and are life".
According to you and your followers you also need to take this verse literal! It takes God's Spirit to discern His word. You will give me an explaination spiritually about this verse using other scriptures to prove what Jesus said wasn't literal. He even allowed His followers to walk away without explanation. You think you have wisdom but your hermeneutics is inconsistance. There is a warning to all those who teach that we will be judged with a greater judgement than those who don't, are you willing to face that judgement if incorrect? James 3:1
I'm 100% confident that the Bride is literal. Just as I am 100% confindent that the baptism of the Holy Spirit is true. I've experienced them both. The Bride has nothing to do with salvation. All I can say is I pray that God led you to the truth and if your not 100% sure, you will find yourself preaching against your creator and the apple of His eye, the Bride. I'm not willing to talk about any mans wife especially God's. As I said before, you are kicking against the goad.
I believe the Spirit led me to this hub because I was confused about the church being the bride. The bible says to test the spirits. That is what I have done. I don't feel as if the my carnal side has led me to this because, the flesh has enmity with things of the Spirit. This began as a bible study on end time prophesy at my church (building) and I had been aware of the passage in Rev.21:9,10 for over a decade. I knew something in my spirit wasn't comfortable with the "church/bride" teaching.
As far as the bread of life goes, Jesus IS that bread, He is the Word, And the Word (bible) is my daily bread. That is where we get fed the truth and the truth is plain to see if you read it the way it is written and don't cloud it with tradition. Even the first recorded miracle Jesus performed at the wedding feast shows that He fulfilled the requirements of the law, ceremony and tradition by filling the "ceremonial" water pots with the best wine.
I have no doubt that true believers are invited to the wedding supper of the Lamb. Paul was quoted in 2 Cor. 11:2 saying, "I have espoused you to one husband, that I may present you AS a chaste virgin to Christ." There's that word AS again. And as you said before Paul didn't have the power to betroth anyone to Christ. In the PARABLE of the ten virgins, they were not the BRIDE. In the PARABLE of the marriage feast, the king's servants were sent to invite GUESTS to the wedding. I can't add or take away anything form the Word. I better add that Jesus is my Savior, my Bread of life and my Shepherd and He leads me to all truth.
I just wanted to add that the passage used in Hosea is reffering to Israel.
Seems Mickey can't take the fact that Rev 21:9-10 says the lamb's wife is holy Jerusalem and not the church. Taken literally Mickey it means the church is not the birde of Christ but Jerusalem is.
Go figure...
I am being led by the Spirit and I can't see where the BIBLE actually says the church is the bride of Christ.
Mickey, I think you are wallowing in your own self righteousness. Jesus filled the requirement of the law, ritual, ceremony and tradition at Calvary and showed that He came to do that at the wedding where He performed His first recorded miracle by filling the CEREMONIAL water pots with the BEST wine, showing He came as He said to fulfill the law. Look at Rev. 21:12-27. It is a reflection of Isaiah 54 especially verse 11 & 12. He is addressing Israel, in Hosea 2:16 He is addressing Israel and I believe Rev. 21 is addressing Israel. I also belive this was revelation of the Holy Ghost to me. You have to have an open mind and stop believing tradition. Christ Himself said,"Beware of the leaven of the pharisees."
All the passages that have been used to support the church/bride THEORY are as cda has said, metaphors, comparisons and similes. 2 Timothy 4:3 says, For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine, but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; 4 and they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables.
I'm just saying what if you're wrong?
Mickey,
I had to add that I'm sorry if I have offended you.
I also wanted to add that someone on here (I think you) used the passage in 2 Corinthians 11:2 and I'm asking how do you explain away the PARABLE of the ten virgins, (Matthew 22)? These were guests of the bride, were they not? And in Rev. 1:6, He hath made us kings and priests unto God and His Father; and Rev. 21:24, And the nations of them which are saved shall walk in the light of it (the bride or city); and the kings of the earth do bring their glory and honour INTO it. 26 and they shall bring the glory and honour of the nations INTO it.
Love in Christ the Lord
Love in Christ the Lord
Scott, No you did not offend me. I just said keep studying. If you really want to talk about the bride contact me at www.unveilingthebride.com and I will converse with you via email without all the interjections. And I will explain 2 Cor. 11:2 in detail. and the 10 virgins.
cda,
Thank you for allowing me to post my thoughts here.
I hope I didn't step on anyones toes.
It seems as though people are as stuck on tradition now as they were in Christ time. I'm glad we understand rituals are no longer required to please God our FATHER!
Are you refering to Rev. 21:12,14 and 24,26?
I think you can see a picture of that in Isaiah 54.
If that's not what you mean feel free to quote me, please.
Mickey,
I looked at your website and I won't be contacting you via e-mail as I believe you think I'm not spiritual enough to see things YOUR way. As I said before you can't show me where the bible actually says the church is the bride of Christ. I've always been told to check what you hear or read to what the bible says and well........it's just not there.
The "custom" of the Jewish wedding of Christ's day I'm aware of, but again, it's not in the bible.
BTW all my quotes have been taken out of the KJV, I do have the NIV, ASV, NKJV, NLT and a Dake's, of which I don't totally agree with on some issues and an Amplified not mention a Strong's and Matthew Henry.
I also am starting to lean more toward a post tribulation rapture(or the taking up) in case you are one of those that don't like the word rapture because it's not in the bible either along with the word trinity.
My wife has been studying these things with me and she fails to see your view on the church/bride concept, too.
Another PARABLE from Jesus is in Matt. 13:19-23.
Is it possible that satan has decieved the church into believing something that is not true?
I haven't written any books. I haven't preached to an audience. I do however eat my Daily Bread. I do believe I have the Spirit. If your reference to the baptism of the holy Spirit is with the evidence of speaking in tongues then that is not scriptural either. The bible plainly says in gal. 5:22 But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, longsuffering, gentleness, goodness, faith, 23 Meekness, temperance; against such there is no law.
Also look at Gal.4:26 But Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the MOTHER of us all.
So if the great city, the holy Jerusalem is the bride of the Lamb and she is the MOTHER of us all How can the church be the bride? Also if a man was to marry his child (that is the way I percieve the relationship between God and the saved), wouldn't that be incest?
He calls me friend, He made us to become sons of God, He has adopted us through the blood of Messiah and the covenant with Abraham.
God bless you and you Jeff and coffee man
Without being rude, it is obvious that you both are infants in Christ. My only prayer Lord is that you open thier eyes not to be in agreement with me but that they not deny themselves the call to be your Bride. Scott it you had read by web page you would of known my belief on the rapture.
I think you mean the post millenial (rapture).
You know the bible says faith without works is dead and in Hebrews 10:24 & 25 And let us consider one another to provoke unto love and good works: Not forsaking the assembling of ourselves together, as the manner of some is; but exhorting one another: and so much the more, as ye see the DAY approaching.
When a person gets saved the Holy Spirit leads him to do good and to be transformed as in Romans 12:1&2.
There is no such thing as a Lone Ranger Christian.
Mickey,
No I didn't read all of your web page, but I read enough to know what YOU believe. This is just a disscusion. you're entitled to your own oppinion. And I don't appreciate you passing judgement on me, cdacoffee or anyone else for that matter as you have no knowledge of anyone's spiritual condition other than your own.
When Jesus raised Lazerus form the dead, He commanded those there to "loose him and let him go", that is what He came to do for man, set us FREE from tradition, ceremonial ritual and the law.
Many have wondered about the brides identity from the Scriptures. Some have suggested her to be the city of God the New Jerusalem referenced in Revelations… “Come, I will show you the bride, the wife of the Lamb.” And he [the angel] carried me away in the Spirit to a mountain great and high, and showed me the Holy City, Jerusalem, coming down out of heaven from God” (Rev 21:9-10 NIV).
A city is not what God has redeemed nor purchased to be His bride. It was a people whom He redeemed that would chose to love and return to Him unlike a city. Examining Scriptures will help us to identity God’s bride. Isaiah calls the people of God, Zion. “I have put my words in your mouth and covered you with the shadow of my hand — I who set the heavens in place, who laid the foundations of the earth, and who say to Zion, ‘You are my people‘” (Isa 51:16 NIV). And again Isaiah says, “The sons of your oppressors will come bowing before you; all who despise you will bow down at your feet and will call you the City of the LORD, Zion of the Holy One of Israel” (Isa 60:14 NIV).
Zion is the name given to the bride of Christ it is also the place where His bride will dwell. “Return, faithless people,” declares the LORD, “for I am your husband. I will choose you — one from a town and two from a clan — and bring you to Zion” (Jer 3:14 NIV). The bride of Christ is also described as living stones and a spiritual house. “As you come to him, the living Stone — rejected by men but chosen by God and precious to him— you also, like living stones , are being built into a spiritual house to be a holy priesthood, offering spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ. For in Scripture it says: “See, I lay a stone in Zion, a chosen and precious cornerstone, and the one who trusts in him will never be put to shame” (1 Peter 2:4-6 NIV). Paul writes to the church at Ephesus and said to them, “you are fellow citizens with the saints, and are of God’s household, having been built upon the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Christ Jesus Himself being the corner stone, in whom the whole building (the bride), being fitted together is growing into a holy temple in the Lord; in whom you also are being built together into a dwelling of God in the Spirit” (Eph. 2:19-22). Therefore the Holy City in Revelation is the dwelling place of the bride of Christ not the bride herself. The city is the home of the bride and her bridegroom Jesus. Many think that the dwelling place of the bride or saved will dwell in heaven. Heaven is where the Bridegroom, Jesus, has prepared the chedar (consummation chamber), and earth is where she will live.
In Revelations 19:7&8, the bride or rather wife of Christ has made herself ready unlike a city which cannot make her self ready. The city, the New Jerusalem, is made by God; it was not made ready by itself. The bride however chooses to prepare herself for her Husband, Christ Jesus, and clothes herself with fine linen. The fine linen is defined as the “righteous acts of the saints”. “Let us rejoice and be glad and give the glory to Him, for the marriage of the Lamb has come and His bride has made herself ready.” And it was given to her to clothe herself in fine linen, bright and clean; for the fine linen is the righteous acts of the saints. And he said to me, “Write, ‘Blessed are those who are invited to the marriage supper of the Lamb’” (Rev 19:7-9 NASB).
Upon His return, Christ descends back to earth with His bride to wage war with the devil. “And I saw heaven opened; and behold, a white horse, and He who sat upon it is called Faithful and True; and in righteousness He judges and wages war… And the armies which are in heaven, clothed in fine linen, white and clean, were following Him on white horses” (Rev 19:11&14 NASB). The army with Christ is His bride who has made herself ready and clothed herself in preparation for her wedding with “righteous acts”. Are you ready for your wedding day with the King of kings? If you have not really believed, you are being wed to Christ Jesus, you will not prepare yourself for a wedding? How then can you truly be ready? See Matthew 25: 1-13.
quote .. The army with Christ is His bride who has made herself ready and clothed herself in preparation for her wedding with “righteous acts”. Are you ready for your wedding day with the King of kings? If you have not really believed, you are being wed to Christ Jesus, you will not prepare yourself for a wedding? How then can you truly be ready? .. end quote
It seems, CDA that Mickey has proved the very point you have been trying to make with this blog, concerning the dangers of believing the bride of Christ doctrine. How unfortunate that so many Christians cannot believe that we have all the righteousness we will ever need IN HIM, already.
Here is the whole in your bucket. You have the marriage supper 1,000 years before the bride shows up. The marriage supper takes place in Rev 19:7&19. Scripture tells us after the 1,000 year reign there is a new heaven and new earth for the old has been burned up, 2Peter 3:7, then the New Jerusalem is brought down out of heaven. Rev 20:4 Rev. 21:1-9. You can't have it both ways. Your doctrine has the bride showing up 1,000 years after the marriage supper. Research when the marriage supper takes place. And as a said before the bride has nothing to do with salvation, not everybody receive the same reward, that Scripture. Your doctring doesn't add up you can twist it all you want to fit your doctrine. The church is not in error you are.
One of the main dangers I have personally seen is the teaching that Christ won't come back "until we make ourselves ready" (ref to Rev 19:7). This makes us "little gods". This is a misunderstanding of how we become righteous in the first place. If I may share this with you (too long to post). In essence we are righteous because God imparts his righteousness to us.
The Bride is Spiritually Mature And the damsel was very fair to look upon, a virgin, neither had any man known her.
-Genesis 24:16
In Genesis 24, we see Eliezer coming for Rebekah, a damsel and a virgin-just as Yeshua is going to come for a spiritually mature bride, not a baby Christian who has not reached spiritual adulthood and isn't old enough to marry.
The Hebrew word for "damsel" is Na'arah, which means "a girl from infancy to adolescence." This is a prophetic picture of the Bride of Christ who has grown to spiritual maturity. She is old enough to marry.
A spiritual child is a carnal Christian (saved, but babes in Christ). They are carnally minded, controlled by the flesh, and not able to learn and understand the deeper truths of God's Word. They live on simple truth, "as newborn babes."
We see in 1 Corinthians 3:1-2:
And I, brethren, could not speak unto you as unto spiritual, but as unto carnal, even as unto babes in Christ. I have fed you with milk, and not with meat: for hitherto ye were not able to bear it, neither yet now are you able.
The Scriptures tell us in 1 Peter 3:18 that we are to grow in grace-like the parable of the seed, we are to mature in the understanding of God and kingdom principles. We are to leave the elementary things and grow into spiritual maturity. For Hebrews 6:1 says: "Therefore, leaving the principles of the doctrine of Christ, let us go on to perfection."
The Greek word for "perfection" is Teliotace,which means "completeness and full maturity." The root word Telios means "completeness, full grown, adult, and mature."
Our goal as believers is not just salvation. We are to strive for perfection and grow in knowledge, having a deeper understanding of God's ways, entering into a deeper intimacy with Him. By growing from faith to faith as Romans 1:17 says, by being drawn from the breast, weaned from the milk-for it is precept upon precept, line upon line, as it says in Isaiah 28:9-10.
OK Here is what you've been looking for.
Compare Isaiah 54 (which is Israel) to Rev. 21 (which again is Israel). Redeemed and restored Israel is the city, the holy Jerusalem. The body is invited to Come by the Spirit and Israel to dwell for ever. It's easy and plain to see.
Now stop arguing before a real (babe) in Christ or an unbeliever that might be looking for salvation and gets turned off stumbles upon all the remarks made at each other, the BODY.
Love, peace and joy to all.
CDA in 1 Cor 11 you must also look not only at the greek like Mickey said but its context too. A pure virgin to a vineyard man? That makes no sense. Thats out of context. I understand your fear. The point of the whole bride context is this - the Bible constantly mentions God as a Jealous God, so he is jealous for us (not in a human sense, but a godly sense. He wants our hearts for Him, not wanting anything but Himself to be First in our hearts). Second, the idea of unity as in marriage. Jesus said "I am in you and you are in me." Third, this relationship is a picture just like any other one - God as our father, friend, master, etc. The point in this is how God is now showing us how deep our intimacy should be with him, for marriage is the most intimate relationship of all.
We are his bride in that sense in that we are betrothed to him, but he has not yet come back. When he does then it will be FULL intimacy with God, like a wife, no longer a bride. For now tho, we dont have that full intimacy and unity. The Bible doesnt use a lot of words for concepts, like the trinity, God's omnipresence or his omniscience or his omnipotence. Yet not believing those about God would be wrong. It does not mean they are not there.
You ask, can a man marry his own body? "Husbands, love your wives, JUST AS Christ also loved the church and gave Himself up for her, 26so that He might sanctify her, having cleansed her by the washing of water with the word,
27that He might present to Himself the church in all her glory, having no spot or wrinkle or any such thing; but that she would be holy and blameless.
So husbands ought also to love their own wives AS THEIR OWN BODIES. He who loves his own wife loves himself;
for no one ever hated HIS OWN FLESH, but nourishes and cherishes it, JUST AS Christ also does the church,
because we are members of His body." Eph 5 I hope that answers the whole Christ marrying his body idea. The husband has to treat his wife like his own body AS Christ does. The point again in him "marrying" his body is that idea of oneness (we need to be one with christ in terms of intimacy, desiring the things he desires, and abiding in him).
And who is this new jerusalem? "Him who overcomes I will make a pillar in the temple of my God. Never again will he leave it. I will write on him the name of my God and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem, which is coming down out of heaven from my God; and I will also write on him my new name." Rev 3:12 Also, Gal 4:26 and Romans in general explains it further, the true Jew is the one circumcised by the spirit.
Insisting we make ourselves ready tho is not antigrace. Take the parable of the Ten Virgins. Doesnt it seem to throw out grace? Like the other parables? But just because they seem that way, would you throw the parables out? But its still part of the Bible. To answer your concern about throwing out grace I would allude to what you can see in Eph 5, how it describes Christ. It says He has cleansed her, washing her in His Word, SO AS to present himself a holy church witohut spot or blemish. It is because of grace and salvation that the bride has been prepared for her groom. I dont know what version you have that says she made herself ready. No version Ive read says that. It just says she is coming out of heaven "prepared as a bride adorned for her husband." None of that implies that she has done it herself, as if her good works are to thank. No it is the garments of christ she has put on, his good deeds. He died for her, purifying her for himself, and now he gets to have her.
oh and another verse to answer the "how can christ marry his own body?" question: Genesis 2:24 "For this reason a man will leave his father and mother and be UNITED to his wife, and they will become ONE FLESH." That oneness, you are of one flesh in a sense (not literally). You are becoming united.
cda,
You are refering to 2 parable in your last post.
The ten virgins and the marraige feast.
Yes they are refering to Israel, but in the ten virgins parable these were obviously GUESTS of the bride as the groom said to them, "I know you not".
Christina Paul quoted Rev. 3:12 Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the TEMPLE of my God. Now see Rev. 21:22 And I saw no temple therein: for the Lord God almighty and the Lamb are the TEMPLE of it. Again, this must be a reference to the BODY!
again 1 Cor 11
2 Cor 11 (not 1). Also, Rev 3 is part of Christ's addressing churches, not Israel or Jews. I would like you to see where you find your definition of holy jerusalem in scripture.
btw, I just want to make sure Im not assuming too much. But cda basically you believe that new jerusalmen is just OT saints and jews? And that we are just guests to this wedding at the end of days, as the church? And the OT is just addressing Israel, not us? And that as a result, New Jerusalem must prepare herself, or basically is saved by works? But this is not something we have to do, as we are jsut guests?
Christina,
In 2 Cor. 11:1 Paul wrote; Would to God ye could bear with me a little in my FOLLY: and indeed bear with me,
Also in verse 2 he is addressing his own converts means he is presenting them to Christ AS a virgin, not the church.
And in Rev. 2 & 3 Jesus is addressing the churches of John's day (present tense) not today's. This rules out the statement to the church of Philadelphia being today's church and in verse people believe "the hour of temptation" refers to the tribulation thus percieving this to be the "rapture", but these are two different words. Then in chapter 4 he (John) begins addressing things to come, ie, in the future. And no new Jerusalem doesn't have to prepare itself, I belive it is redeemed Irael and the bride and we shall enter into it as part of the body of Christ.
True. I still want to know where it says the bride has to prepare herself. Since CDA claims that such doctrine teaches this, I am interested in knowing where it says that. The statements above say that the bride has to make herself ready without spot or blemish, but that verse is Eph 5 where it says Christ does that, not the bride.
Christina,
I don't know the scripture without looking it up and I don't have time to right now, but the people that teach this doctrine are refering to the passage where it talks about the church that is spotless and without blemish.
As CDA has expressed Christ has become our rigtheousness. We can't add to what He did on the cruel cross of Calvary!
So who is the new jerusalem in your definition (the wife of the lamb as it is defined in Rev 21)? If I am following your thinking then the bride is not part of the body (the church is the body), and the bride is the jews/israel (whom God made those promises to in the OT)?
The bride is the holy city. Israel could be the bride I guess. But Rev 21:9-10 says it is the holy Jerusalem.
And youu are correct in what I am saying, the bride is not part of the Body. It is holy Jerusalem.
And God did make those promises to Israel and we have those promises too since Jesus died "once and for all" His sacrifice covers us too. That is one of the reasons it is called the New Covenant. God has extended those same promises to Christians too.
what is your interpretation of these veres
James 2
14What use is it, my brethren, if someone says he has faith but he has no works? Can that faith save him? 15If a brother or sister is without clothing and in need of daily food, 16and one of you says to them, "Go in peace, be warmed and be filled," and yet you do not give them what is necessary for their body, what use is that? 17Even so faith, if it has no works, is dead, being by itself. 18But someone may well say, "You have faith and I have works; show me your faith without the works, and I will show you my faith by my works." 19You believe that God is one You do well; the demons also believe, and shudder. 20But are you willing to recognize, you foolish fellow, that faith without works is useless? 21Was not Abraham our father justified by works when he offered up Isaac his son on the altar? 22You see that faith was working with his works, and as a result of the works, faith was perfected
John 3:36
"He who believes in the Son has eternal life; but he who does not obey the Son will not see life, but the wrath of God abides on him."
Heb 5:8-10 And having been made perfect, He became to all those who obey Him the source of eternal salvation
Are verses like these in your opinion teaching that we must do works, thus throwing out salvation and removing grace form the gospel?
I think once you have faith and have obtained grace, you start the process of "being transformed by the renewal of your mind", Romans 12:2. This makes you WANT to good and good things. Faith with works is when you believe enough to trust and ACT upon it.
I was using NASB because when I researched it it came up as the most literal translation of the original text (more than the KJV). So I dont think its mistranslated. But I like your take on the verses. My opinion is regardless of who the bride is, I just dont think Rev 19:7 necessarily teaches works. I think its line of thought could be like the verses above. Not thats its teaching to take away grace, but its teaching evidence of grace (a changed life). Basically, clothing ourselves in Christ (Gal 3).
And Jesus said "I go to prepare a place for you!"
If one is married, we call the woman our wife, but when she comes down to meet the groom, she is his bride. The Lamb's wife, is his bride. Jesus spoke a parable of five foolish, and five wise virgins who was waiting for the bridgroom to come. This parable dipicts those who would be ready and those who would be unprepared. All ten virgins slept, while waiting for the bridegroom to come, but the five wise virgins had something extra which was oil. This oil dipicts the Holy Spirit and that is what keeps them ready. Enoch, and Elijiah were caught up onto God without tasting death. The only way they could make it there was that they were sealed with the righteousness of Christ. The new Jerusalem does not come down until the thousand years are expired. All of the righteous are inside the New Jerusalem when it comes down because they came up in the first resurrection. The rest of the dead which are the wicked do not live again until the thousand years has expired. This is the second resurrection which is the second death that the wicked would experience. This when the great White throne judgement will take place. So blessed is he that comes up in the first resurrection on such the second death had no power, but we shall be priest of God and shall reign with Christ. Rev. chapter 20.
Hi Coffeeman,
As I stated in a previuos post, I think the ten virgins were GUESTS of the bride, ie; bride's maids.
The groom said "I no you not" and he was betrothed to ONE not ten. Thanks
It is well established in the bible that a woman is symbolic of the church as in Rev chapter 12 and Rev chapter 17. The woman of Rev. 12 is Christ Church. The woman of chapter 17 is symbolic of all false religion. If you can follow chapter 12 of Revelation, here is what it says; There is a woman that is clothed the sun and the moon under her feet, and she has a crown of twelve stars upon her head. The woman is clothed with the sun. The bible says that the sun was to rule by day and the moon by night. The moon gets its light from the Sun. The sun is the greater light and the moon is the lesser light. The old testament was full of types, and shadows of things to come. It was the lesser light. When Jesus came and fulfilled all things that the old testament spoke regarding Himself. The woman which is symbolic of the church was then clothed with the sun, the brightness of the gospel. The moon was under her feet symbolic of the fufillment of the types, and shadows. The crown of twelve stars on her head, is symbolic of the twelve tribes which make up people of every nation, kindred, tongue, and people. A star is symbolic of an angel as in Rev chapter 1 when Jesus was holding the seven stars in His right hand. An angel is a ministering spirit sent forth to those that shall be hiers of salvation. For each tribe there is an angle assigned to each one, as in Rev. chapter one. Each church had a ministering spirit. Revelation chapter 12 speaks about the great controversey, from its inception until the end of time.
Stay with me if you can, Rev 12 introduces another character the great Red Dragon who is called the old serpent, the Devil and Satan, which deceived the whole world, he was cast out of heaven into the earth. The Dragon drew a third part of the stars with him. Rev 12:9 says that his angels were cast out with him. Satan drew a third part of the angelic host by his influnce. Satan operates through kingdoms, and powers of influnce. Wickedness in high places. Rev. 12 pictures the woman as having a man child who was to rule all nations with a rod of iron but her child was caught up unto God, and to his throne. We know that the woman did not represent Mary, because she went into the wilderness for one thousand two hundred and to days, which is 1260 literal years. Satan wanted to killed the boy child as soon as it was born. Satan was then working through Herod the king, who issued a decree to kill all the boy children from 2yrs and under in an effort to kill the Christ Child. Satan has continued his attack against the woman the church, because he can no longer attack Christ. Rev 12:12 The time frame the woman was in the wilderness is the time of the period, called the dark ages in which Rome was a world power and persecuted the church.
Revelation 17 speaks about Mystery Babylon the Mother of Harlots, and abominations of the earth. This woman was drunken with the blood of the saints and the martyrs of Jesus. This Woman is seen sitting on a scarlet coloured beast, full of names of blasphemy, having seven heads and ten horns, just like the dragon beast of Rev. 12. This Woman, considers herself to be a mother, she has some daughters that are just like her. This woman will be judged, and punished for her wickness.
So here is the point, all of the saints are represented under woman of Rev. 12. And all of the wicked are represented by the woman of Rev. 17.
Rev. chapter seven. speaks of four angels standing on the four corners of the earth, north, south, east, and west. There were ready to release the winds which is symbolic of stife, war and political uphevel, but the angel from east cried out to the four angels, to whom it was given to hurt the earth and sea. Saying hurt not the earth, nor the sea, nor the trees until he was finished with sealing the servants of God in there foreheads, which is their minds.
The twelve tribes were divided with three tribes on the east, three tribes on the north, three tribes on the south, and three tribes on the west. New Jerusalem has three gates on the south, the north, the east, and the west. The childeren of Israel's camp was set up the same way. The children of Israel was a type of the New Jerusalem. If you can recieve this we are spiritual Israel. There are twelve gates to the city of Jerusalem and all the people of God will go in one of those gates.
So the New Jerusalem represents the bride of Christ because it will contain the saints of God. It is the place that Jesus said He was going to prepare for us.
When Jesus comes again, He will come with the host of His angels according to Matthew, and they will gather His elect from one end of the earth to the other. Every eye shall see Jesus when He comes, it will not be a secret. The graves will open up and all the saints who die serving the Lord will come forth. And those who are alive at the coming of Christ will be changed in moment and the twinkling of an eye. And both will be caught up together to meet the Lord in the air. And so shall we ever be with the Lord. What happens to the wicked the bible says they will run to the rocks and mountains, and say to the rocks and mountains fall on us, and hide us from the face of Him that sitteth upon the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb, for the great day of His wrath is come, and who shall be able to stand. 2Thessalonians 2:8 then shall that wicked be revealed, whom the Lord shall consume with the spirit of His mouth and shall destroy with the brightness of His coming. When Jesus comes back in the clouds of glory it is the starting point of the thousand year reign with Christ. During the thousand years the saints will have the distinction of reviewing the judgment books of God. After review the books of God, the saints will declare just and true are your ways Oh God. The reason that the saints tears are dried up is because they have participated in the judgment during the thousand years. Rev 20:4 and they understand why brother,sister, mother did not make it.
There are two resurrections, the resurrection of life and the resurrection of damnation. The two resurrections are a thousand years apart. The saints come up in the resurrection of life. The wicked come up in the resurrection of damnation. There is a blessing pronounced on the saints who come up in the first resurrection. The second death will have no power over you. But the wicked receive two deaths. A physical death, and then an eternal death. Jesus puts it this way dont fear him that is able to destroy the body, but rather fear him, that is able to destroy both body and soul. The wages of sin is death, buth the gift of God is eternal life. Jesus reward is with Him to give every man according to his works.
When Jesus comes back in the clouds of heaven, Isaiah and Jeremiah fortold of what would happen to the earth. They declare that the fruitful place would be come a wilderness, and all the cities will be broken down at the presence of the Lord. The rivers would run backwards, and the mountains would skip across the sea like rams. They declare that the earth would be turn upside down, and the inhabitants would be scattered upon the earth like dung, and there will be no body left to bury them or to gather them.
Rev 20 says that an angel comes down from heaven, having the key of the bottomless pit and a great chain in his hand. He laid hold on the dragon, that Old serpent, which is the Devil and Satan, and bound him a thousand years, He was cast into the bottomless pit, and shut him up, and set a seal upon him, that he should deceive the nations no more, till the thousand years should be fulfilled: and after that he mus be loosed a little season.
There is a lot of symbolic language, but here is the some of it. Satan cannot be bound by a literal chain. If you remember the man possessed with a devil in tombs, plucked the chain that bound him like it was nothing. Satan was bound by a chain of circumstances. He could not deceive the righteous because they were all with Christ, and he could not deceive the wicked because they were all dead. They were all left dead upon the earth with no one to bury them or gather them. The Earth will
mdwashpower,
Good study. The only thing is, I don't believe the woman in Rev. 12 refers to the church. I believe it refers to Israel, which in the OT IS refered to as a woman. In the NT the church/body is refered to in the MASCULINE form and that would be right, as the church is the body of Christ (Col. 1:18).
Even in your comments on the 12 gates in new Jerusalem, this eludes to Israel. Compare Is.54 to Rev.21, both describe Israel not the church. Can a man marry his own body? How about his son or daughter? That would be incest. Some things in the bible are symbolic but, some are literal.
I wanted to add if I may, Jesus says in Mark 3:35 "For whosoever shall do the will of God, the same is my brother, and my sister, and mother."
A man really shouldn't marry his brother, sister or mother.
If this is true, then God being holy and righteous wouldn't either
Good point there Scott! Note that Jesus covers the entire family except the husband, wife, or father. Since we cannot be the father of Jesus nor can we be the husband of Jesus nor can we be the wife of Jesus.
If we say, that we are the bride of Christ, then we will loose our inheritance.
We are SONS of God, have the Spirit of Sonship inside of us, members of a male body, the Body of Christ. He (Christ) is masculine.
Answer one question. Did Adam marry his body? Case closed!
God did not created women from the dust but from Adam's body in whom became his wife. Why not just make her as He did Adam. The answer is obvious, at least to some.
Mickey,
Did Adam marry his body? God CREATED Adam first. Then He MADE the woman from the (side) He took out of Adam. Gen. 2:23, And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was TAKEN OUT OF MAN. You believe the body/church is the bride. We don't, and the more I study this the more I'm convinced that you're doctrine is not true. You base all your believe on the scriptures that give comparisons and similes, as cda said. The bible DOES literally state that God calls Himself a husband to ISRAEL (I think it was you that used the passaage in Hosea where God called Himself Ishi). If you believe in replacement theology then this may work for you.
You still haven't produced one passage that ACTUALLY says we are the bride of Christ. The ones you use have to be added to or read into to make it say that.
Christ is consider a bridegroom, so a groom must have a wife. Is Christ in love with a city or the people of the city? New Jerusalem is a city. The old tabernacle was designed according to the pattern of the one in heaven. New Jerusalem is exactly like the one that was on earth. The children of Isareal represented 12 tribes which out of these 12 tribes comes every other nation. We are spiritual Isareal. And you will enter through one of the gates of the city. New Jerusalem will house the saints of GOD. It is the saints that Christ Died for, and it is the saints that He will receive. Not a City that He prepared for them who loves Him. Jesus says He was going to prepare a place for them (His Saints) the place is the New Jerusalem and its location is in heaven right now. Jesus says He is coming back to receive His saints so that we might be where He is, and He is in Heaven. The wicked the bible says did not have a place that was prepared for them. Only those whose names are written in the Lamb's book of life will enter into the place He has prepared. The children of Isareal is a type of Spiritual Isareal the Church which houses every nation, kindred, tongue and people. Thats why in Christ there is neither jew, or gentile,or greek, or male or female. Is the church the literal body of CHRIST? NO is the answer. We are many members but one body. The Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost are one. Jesus prayed that we would be one even as He is one with the Father. A woman and a man becomes one through marriage. These twain becomes one. The oneness that Christ is speaking of when it comes to the Church is a kin to the oneness of a marital relationship of a man and a woman. It is this pattern that is used throughout the bible to describe Christ closeness with His people. As a woman who is espouse to her husband. CHRIST desires to have a personal relationship with His people. We are the sheep of His pasture, but we are not literal sheep. And better yet where is His pasture?
Show me the passage in the OT that says God will Raise up an institution and call it a Church. And teach us the spiritual significants of God taking a part of Adam's body for Him to marry?
http://makestraightpaths.com/jesus_the_bridegroom.
The above is a link to a well done synopsis on the bride of Christ doctrine. It is well thought out and makes perfect spiritual sense. Use your common sense people! :-)
I know of no OT scripture that says God will raise up an institution or call it a church. Furthermore I don't recall anyone claiming there is one. But, the spiritual significance of woman being taken from the man's side is to show that she is to be beside him, not in front, back, beneath or below him. Thank you for asking.
Please excuse the typo in the former post. I meant, not in front, back, beneath or above him.
Mickey as time progresses words change there meaning, sometimes, but the escents of the thought is not lost. Today we dont refer to the church as a synagogue, but the escents of the thought is that it is a meeting place for the people of God. One great gift that God gave to Adam was the ability to name things and whatever name Adam called it that became its name. So likewise, we have the same gift of naming persons, places, and things, and whatever we decide to call it as a refrence that is what it will be; unless we decide to change it. New words are being added to the English language on an ongoing basis. And for those of you who are studying the word, know this that everything in the bible is not to be taken literal, especially if it is dealing with symbolic language or making a parallel between something you know and something you dont know. That is what a parable is. Taking something natural and fimilar to explain something spiritual. The substance of the thoughts can be lost if you do not understand the parallel. GOD made a city for HIS people to dwell in to be with Him. That is the substance of the whole marriage of the Lamb.
If you are referencing Gen.2:19, God created Adam with a superior intelect and he named the LIVING CREATURES, not places and things, and it wasn't a gift. Nothing symbolic about that. What about in Gen.1:5,8,13,19,23 and 31, were those 24 hour periods or was THAT symbolic, too? And how about Gen.1:29, does that mean it's OK to eat marijuana? Yes, there is a lot of symbolism in the bible but, not always. God was pretty plain about who He called Himself a husband to.
Cda,
You can't even answer my questions! You need to leave the theological debates to theologians. If you think I'm grabbing for straws, reveals your shallow understanding of the Word.
cda,
Evolution is theological debate, too!
Theory is an unproven assumption or speculation, for us lay persons it's a guess!
The Bride of Christ is the Church because the Apostle Paul wrote this in Ephesians 5:23-25. Contrary to what you say. Christ is the husband of the Church where the Holy Spirit resides in each person that makes up the Bride or the Church, 1 Corinthians 3:16-17. In the Old Testament Israel was the Bride of Christ or the God of Israel then, Jeremiah 31:32-33. The Wife was put away from God because of sin and will be redeemed when he returns. The Church is the place where the redeemed Israel is bride of Christ, Romans 11:25-27, Revelation 22:17. This is all very symbolic and you do need the Holy Spirit to understand what God is doing here.
The Lionswhelp
Lionswhelp said .. Contrary to what you say. Christ is the husband of the Church where the Holy Spirit resides in each person that makes up the Bride or the Church, 1 Corinthians 3:16-17. .. end quote
Are you saying that Christ will marry the Holy Spirit?
Debradoo,
Lionswhelp is says Paul wrote in Eph.5:22-25 that the bride of Christ is the church. My bibles don't say that at all, does yours? It does say Christ is the head of the church and for husbands to love their wives AS Christ loves the church. 1 Cor.3:16 & 17 says nothing about a bride.
He is right about Israel being the WIFE as there are many OT scriptures that support that but, I'm not going to list them. Finally, In Rev.22:17, the Spirit (the Holy Spirit) and the bride (the holy Jerusalem, Rev.21:9,10) say, Come.
He needs to look at Col.1:18, And He is the HEAD of the body, the church.
Scott
Wow, we must have the same exact Bible cause mine does not say that either!
Why is it that people cling so desperately to this "Bride of Christ" doctrine? Those that refuse this doctrine are usually accused of being without the 'revealing by the Holy Spirit' and 'immature in their Christian walk'. But, I have found through experience that usually whatever anyone accuses another of, they are the guilty party in the end.
Debradoo,
I wonder why people want to make a big mystery out of the bible instead of just reading what it says. I guess they can't help it if they've been taught wrong.
It just astounds me that one cannot let this doctrine go for just a moment and allow the light to shine. Many seem almost afraid to let this doctrine go. Is it possible that their (their is those that adhere strictly to this bride doctrine) entire belief system collapses if they were to question?
This may explain many that go astray. Their faith is in their belief system (doctrine) and not the Word of God.
And all this time I thought we were to come as little chidren.
It is ALL relative anyway.
Hi cda,
Hoe about Gal. 4:26? But the Jerusalem above is free, which is the mother of us all. And Gal. 4:28-31 calling us CHILDREN, not a bride or wife!
Just another thought...............
cda,
I found this passage this morning. Just wanted to share it with you. Matt.9:15 And Jesus said to them, Can the CHILDREN (or sons) of the bridechamber mourn, as long as the bridegroom is with them? Then it refer to John3:29 He that hath the bride is the bridegroom: but the FRIEND of the bridegroom, which standeth and heareth him, rejoiceth greatly because of the bridegroom's voice: this my joy (His friend) therefore is fulfilled.
Again the reference is to sons and a friend.
This 'bride of Christ' doctrine also supports the reformation theology. Reformation theology is the belief that Christians are the spiritual replacement of the nation of Israel (or God's chosen) and it supports anti-semitism. We are supposed to pray for and support the nation of Israel. This is, indeed, a dangerous doctrine.
Oops .. mean 'replacement theology' not reformation theology, though reformation is just a nice way of saying replacement.
The church I attend teaches having a personal relationship with Jesus, not making one's self good enough. I think that's what all the churches need to focus on. The ONLY way to be ready.
Whats great about this hub is that it tells the truth about who the bride of christ is.
Just because we aren't the bride doesn't mean we can't have an intimate relationship with Him.
Barry,
Exactly, like a father and son, not a wife. I can't be the wife of another male. That wouldn't line up just right, would it?
Interesting hub and comments.. We all need to remember that using a Greek translation only muddy's the waters. Therefore, it's imperitive to understand the scripture writings from a Hebrew perspective as well as understanding Hebrew culture.
cdacoffee - Though you state correctly that the church is not the bride of Christ, I urge you to turn to the Hebrew roots of your faith so that you can gain much more insight into the TRUTH of many things about the 'Christian' church of today. It is missing many, many things, including the TRUE Feasts of God (Easter and Christmas have nothing to do with Yahshua/Jesus!).
Absolutely Barry and well said!
Amen, we are complete in Him, we don't have to prepare, in fact, our conversation is in heaven (Col 2:10 Philippians 3;20) We are NO bride.
Thanks for sharing your study. I woke up this morning with those famous words "without spot or wrinkle" so strong in my mind. I asked the Lord what He is really saying. How do we get to the place where we are without spot or wrinkle? And I ss I asked him about it, it was clear we are already righteous, clean, a holy people, in fact, a peculiar people. So I set out to find some answeres. While searching I found your post. Awesome to know the Holy Spirit is speaking the same thing to others. Thinking that we have more to do, to make ourselves ready and cleanse ourself is the same bondage I came out of as a former Catholic. It leads to self-rigtheousness or thinking you have to do more. As, if the work on the cross was insufficient. Thank you Father for revealing your truth and freedom in Christ. We are holy, righteous and presentable to our Lord! Simply because of God's own sacrifice.
I was searching and ran across your site. A good point about not making ourselves ready. Impossible. If it was we would have no need for the redemption that Christ offers.
However I truly am sorry that you have missed the intimacy that our salvation brings. A bride would not be a bride without the example of the love of the trinity for His creation. We are meant for so much more than physical love. The emotional bond that a man and wife share are merely a taste of what Christ offers.
P.S. We are the new Jerusalem... We are grafted in, and we become His glory. Love ya.
You're right I can't judge the intimacy that you have. I am sorry for that.
I don't say that there is no intimacy in fellowship. I will say that this is not the full extent of what Father wants us to have. He created us to enjoy, not to fight through life. That was the result of the fall. He made us in His image like nothing else created. In my opinion God is a good artist. The very best. In fact a perfect artist. This is why when He created us in His image He made us just like Him. It's beautiful. We were created to experience all possible purity. Purity is joy. Everything that is good was made by Him and for Him. Back and forth. To love and be loved... That is our purpose. And what would love be if we could not experience it to the very fullest. So there is no love that we will not experience with Him.
I DO NOT COME AGAINST YOU! I want you to know that. :) I am your brother for sure. Thanks for responding.
Why is the thought that those of us who do not accept that we are the 'bride of Christ' is .. We cannot have an intimate relationship with Him? What can be more intimate than someone knowing me and all my stinking baggage and still making a decision to suffer on my behalf, and then leaving the decision to acknowledge the suffering and death, up to me? My husband and I have an intimate relationship, but he would NEVER go so far as to do as Jesus has done for me. My husband would not allow me to lie to him and take from him and mess around on him, etc. And then my husband would not die for me in an act of suffering (offering me redemption) and leave the decision to stay or go up to me. God's relationship towards me cannot be anything BUT intimate. He knows it all when it comes to me and He still chooses to love me and call me His. And my relationship towards God is intimate because I receive His love and grow in His love and understand that NOBODY can love me like HE loves me. NOBODY. My love towards God is on an intimate level because I am totally dependent upon Him for my being. And it is more important to God that I focus on His love towards me and not so much on my love towards Him. It is HIS love that makes the difference.
That is good. Again, I am sorry for judging your intimacy with Christ. I already did apologize for that. :) I mean it.
You have an awesome point, but read Hosea. That is the love that He has for us. I'm sure you and your husband are in love, otherwise you would not be together. Tell me that you love any person in the world more than your husband and I'll tell you that you are missing God's plan. Even my mother does not love me as much as she loves my father. And I had great parents. The point is if there is a comparison to the ultimate love that the Trinity has for us it is an intimate marriage. A fairy tale romance, where His love is perfect. The kind of love that only the young believe in. Thus a childlike faith is necessary in order to understand it. I desire that from Him, but His holiness demands that I remember my place. A servant sent to work in His fields. But a prince adopted into His line, and a constant and loving admirer.
Please do not take offence at anything I have said, for it is said in love.
Hey Jordan. Good to meet you. I am not denying that God has compared His love toward us and our love toward Him as a marriage. But, it is comparable because it's meaning is that we are to be faithful to Him as He is to us ...I do not believe that we are to actually marry Him. Or that we are the bride of Christ, nor are we going to be His bride.
And I am going to watch my words carefully here .. But the only intimacy I can think of (and please correct me if wrong) that is between a husband and wife that lacks in other relationships is of a sexual nature?
My husband, next to Jesus, is the most important person in my life. But even he (hubby) does not come close to being the Man in my life that Jesus is and always will be.
Marriage is a covenant relationship. And our relationship with God is a covenant relationship .. And I believe this is the point God is making in His Word when He speaks of marriage and His people in the NT.
This 'bride of Christ' doctrine can be dangerous on so many levels. Just as CDA has pointed out time and time again. It puts our thinking on a wrong path where the Word of God is concerned. And this leads to wrong actions (like wasting our time on works that Jesus has already taken care of.)
And I do not take offense and hope you do not as well.
No The Church is not the bride of Christ. The bride will come out of the Church. The Church is asleep but the bride of Christ is getting ready. She made herself ready! How did she make herself ready? She applied the Truth of Gods Word to her life. She perfected holiness in the fear of God. Like Enoch she walked with God. Remember Christ will do His own choosing who His bride is. If we say we are the bride of Christ then how is He doing the choosing?
Excellent hub.. this should knock some pride outta the churches lol... my sentiments exactly.
Im glad this truth is finally getting out, maybe some other truths will come forth.
thanks
Thanks Debra. I enjoyed this conversation. "As iron sharpens iron, so one man sharpens another." I have been strengthened and do draw closer to Him. I will not attempt to earn his grace. :) I will simply pour myself out on Him. That's what He asks. :) The rest is elementary and unimportant. I respectfully disagree, but wish the blessings of Christ upon you all and your respective ministries. (Whether they be to hundreds, thousands, or the ones you meet at the coffe shop.)
GOD Bless.
Jordan
Thanks Jordan! I receive those blessings in the name of Jesus. It has been a pleasure to converse with you as you are able to defend without offending. That is rare on these sites. God bless!
and for the real thing Jesus used to pray in a temple/mihrab as far as we have in his teachings and it was Peter the disciple of Jesus who founded the first church and we have to find out the truth in the gospel so far as in the bible there are two verses on which Jesus is rebuking Peter and proving him Satan and telling his other disciples not follow with what peter comes with after him as the following verses in Mark:"
8:33 But when he had turned about and looked on his disciples, he rebuked Peter, saying, Get thee behind me, Satan: for thou savourest not the things that be of God, but the things that be of men. 8:34 And when he had called the people unto him with his disciples also, he said unto them, Whosoever will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.
then do we follow the Peter that Jesus Christ said to him Go to my back satan when we are using churches for praying and ignoring where Jesus Chris used to pray.
So far an in all are we in this gloomy lose?
Some comments after reading all the above.
The bride making herself ready does not necessarily infringe on us being complete in Christ. While you are correct that many preachers err greatly here, there are many ways of making one's self ready that do not imply that you are sinful or incomplete. You are in danger of being accused of using this as a strawman, though your comments appear to be sincere. It's great to emphasized the full scope of God's grace in Christ, but the two are potentially completely different subjects.
Secondly, while scripture never equates the church with the bride, it also never makes them mutually exclusive. You can demonstrate that those who blithely co-identify them are walking in ignorance, but you have nowhere in the above (and i hope i've read it all carefully) demonstrated either who she is (that is, who is the New Jerusalem) or where she comes from (other than some vague guesses that she might be some part of Israel.) This puts you in danger of denying one aspect of something (quite well) that you on the other hand profess to know nothing about. The reason I see this as dangerous is that it puts your position on a subject above the subject itself. Doing so usually results in the cessation of learning.
Thirdly, "Micky" with whom you've had the most discussion on this topic said about 8 months ago: "Not all of Adam was the bride. Note that God didn't create Eve from the earth as He did Adam. But took a rib out of the body of Adam, not his whole body. The whole Church is not the bride, ..." I thought this a most interesting point, one that does not necessarily contradict your position (see? i had to call it a 'position' instead of a 'consideration'), yet no one seemed prompted to explore the point at the time. I had been hoping for more discussion on "Who is the bride?" than on "Who isn't the bride?"
I do not yet have a settled opinion on these matters, so the above comments are simply a response to having read this webpage (found in a search) thus far.
peace
Agreed. It only could be the free grace of God that makes us ready. And yes, many in Christendom fail to understand that our works are pre-accepted by God because we have been "accepted in the Beloved" by adoption, "that we might become God's righteousness in Him." To attempt to please God with our works, rather than trusting that He is already pleased with Christ's work, appears to be the essence of Hebrews 3 and 4 in which we are warned to enter into His rest, because the work is finished. How dare we try to work in an arena in which God himself rests? Yet we are to be diligent to enter into that rest. "For he that has entered into his rest, he also has rested from his works, as God did from his own."
So the Sabbath there is the Sabbath of new creation, of which Christ is the first-fruits. And just like God did not take kindly to violations of the Sabbath under law, he does not take kindly to our violating new creation's Sabbath, in which we would attempt to work out what is already finished; i.e. God vindicated by Christ's righteousness.
So works themselves are fine; the problem comes when we think that somehow they'll make us righteous.
I think in this light it would be helpful to differentiate between the grace that saves us, and the grace by which we live before him. There's not a thing we could do without the saving grace, but we have fellowship with him as we walk in his grace; that is, we are working together.
I trust you would agree?
I don'y agree with you totally! what did Paul mean when he siad he espoused us to one husband
BRIDE OF CHRIST - THE CRACKING OF THE FOUNDATION OF TRUTH
Excellent analysis of how a seemingly slight misquoting of the Word is the initial fracture line or chip that leads inexorably to cracking a large section of one's foundation. The truth is simply eroded by an error in knowledge or Biblical application, the result of which suffocates understanding, blessings and wisdom, perhaps for millions of others.
WHO's FAULT FOR THE ERROR - MAN OR SATAN?
Such misquoting or erroneous insertion by man - "Bride" of Christ - also has a broader lesson, namely, that such error and its wide impact has nothing to do with
satanic activity. Committing errors in the Truth of the Word violates laws as concrete as the law of gravity.
Evidence can be gleaned on even a grander scale, as cdacoffee mentioned in the 9th paragraph from the top, the "...[Bride of Christ] was first coined by the Roman Catholic Church...". We can appreciate the panorama he just focused on: he went back to 100-200 AD!
Is there any wonder the fracture line is as broad as we
see it 2000+ yrs later? Same error. Same splat from gravity's pull.
HOW DID THE ERROR PERSIST?
cda's analysis here is to me an excellent example of many professed untruths: to think of the ramifications of parroting erroneous leadership; simply - but a harsh reality - is that it's because of incorrect teaching from the very beginning. What else has been?
THE RAMIFICATIONS ABOUT WHO WE ARE IN CHRIST
There are comments by others that disagree with cda's Biblical premises, not just his opinions. Is there any ramifications for us personally? I believe we can examine at least two topics in prayerfully:
(1) Why did Paul imply in Ephesians 1:1-2, by writing to the "saints" and "faithful", both to identify others by title as well as the order of the titles (saints preceding faithful?
(2) What is the implication of Paul's discourse of the existence of a "remnant" in Romans 9 & 11 to us today?
It appears by this word, through Paul's explanation as a reflection of the existence of a remnant through past millennia, that such a group of believers was always present to carry on the truth. Does it apply to believes today?
Thanks, cda, for the insights.
this is foolish teaching. How do you explain the story of Hosea? And Ezekiel 16? Israel is a type of the church in the old testament.
I almost see your point about getting ourselves ready because I agree we are saved by grace. But we should make our selves pretty. We should strive for holiness. GOD said be ye holy for I am holy
It's apparent that one of the issues that keeps resurfacing here is that of an overzealous defense of free grace. I don't believe anyone in the entire discussion above is trying to erode the simple truth that God's grace is all from God, and our attempts to contribute to our own salvation are "as filthy rags."
However, the subject of the bride of the Lamb is a most peculiar forum from which to occasion such remarks. They might be better treated as two separate subjects, because they are.
Yet cdacoffee replies to me, "I see no real need to explore it beyond that. I've decided to accept it at face value. The question has been answered in those passages[...] And it isn't that I know nothing about The New Jerusalem but it is that the New Jersulam is not the central topic of this Hub. "
Well then, what IS the central topic of this Hub? Grace? The URL at the top says "Who-Is-The-Bride-of-Christ". That's how I found this page; the search engine spit it out when I was researching the bride of Christ. I don't even know what a "Hub" is, other than the fact that I can read what others have written, and there is a space at the bottom for contributions.
As to Eric's comment, I am intrigued. If Israel in the old testament is a type of the Church (sounds dispensational), would that apply for most/all instances of Israel's history? If so, there would be quite a bit of material to digest regarding the church.
Also, (Eric), I didn't understand to what you were referring when you said "this is foolish teaching."
My general opinion on subjects about which scripture is largely silent, is 'Let's wait and see.' Not that we can't understand; there is no upper limit on wisdom. But until we do understand, there is little use in making a doctrine out of it.
To Him that overcometh will I make a pillar in the temple of my God and he shall no more go out: and I will write upon him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, which is new Jerusalem, which cometh down out of Heaven from my God: and I will write upon him my new name... The new Jerusalem is also the bride of christ as is the city, I could say I am canadian, that ties me into the country... The people and land are one they are married... Even as Jacob's name was changed to Israel, even his 12 sons have their names as the Land... That which is passed is a shadow of what is now come, They are recognised as one... I have found with God there is a work, yet as we rest in Him, we have to come into agreement with the word and put on christ, by grace we are saved, yes, now lets go on by His enabling grace and also His sustaining grace for that better resurrection, That only those who are prepared as the Lambs wife(mature) without spot will enter in... many are called, few are chosen... Faith without works is dead, our works is to believe and to press into the things of God, even the mark of our high calling as it is written... For we are to wait on God every day for our heavenly manna, and only do as He instructs us to do, in and by His Spirit, For those that are lead by the spirit of God are the children of God, otherwise it is self works and will account for nothing... As we go from Faith to Faith, Glory to Glory we receive the hidden manna of God, yes deeper understanding that is written yet blinded to a one that has not reach that maturity yet, the Lord will open our eyes to see what we were blinded too, but until we came to the place of being mature enough for that strong meat, he will keep us blinded... Yes we have been born again that is our renewed spirit in us, even unto the 30 fold glory,(virgins without number) now we need to press in for a better prise, even the redemption of the flesh, and that can only be done as we rest in Jesus and Holy Spirit leads us into all truth as we mortify put (to death the deeds of the flesh) as we put on Christ... This is the work of the Holy Spirit for the bride, after she has been proven faithful, She is then seperated unto God for a work that only He can do, she is not the church at large who call themselves christian... She is the obedient, faithful one who sits at the feet of her Lord and doesn't do a thing that He does not instruct her to do... She calls him Lord even as Sarah calls Abraham Lord,(shadow) are we not Abraham's seed, the seed of faith... The wife is even more mature then the bride, we are completely devoted to Jesus... yet if you can't understand the bride, then I am surely not going into the Lambs wife... These truths can only be received by revelation, I guess that is why the book is called the revelation of Jesus... His is the I Am even the bridegroom, what good is a bridegroom without a bride... Now is the church at large the bride, NO! there is a seperation that take place even as Jesus seperated Peter, John and James to only reveal to them on the Mt. of transfiguration His Glory and they also witnessed Elijah and Moses... Why were the other excluded from that revelation... God is the potter it is He that takes cerain vessels and makes them fit for His good pleasure... Therefore, please do not come against those that God has revealed things too, for if the same had been revealed to you as even I have received, then you would know what we are saying when we can identify with the bride and wife, not by our own readings but by revelation on who Christ is to certain ones...
Wow, beautifully said CDA!! I am reminded of Psalm 46:10, Be still and know that I am God. And also of Psalm 127:1, Except the LORD build the house, they labour in vain that build it: except the LORD keep the city, the watchman waketh but in vain.
Christianity is not just a matter of coming to know God. But also of coming to know the devil and our own human nature. Coming face to face with our own 'self'.
Waiting on God (and staying in belief and faith, no matter our feelings) and trusting that we will hear from Him, is what the 'resting in God' is all about.
It can be rather easy to get out there and build a church or witness to a neighbor or build a homeless shelter or visit the jails and hospitals and believe we do it for Him. But, to sit and wait on the Lord to guide us and direct us in our works (and to grow in patience and understanding while waiting) is the hard part. Trusting in Him completely and trusting in our ability to hear Him, this is the hardest of endeavors.
Moving forward without hearing from God is too easy. Staying put until we are sure He has instructed us, this is tough.
You have well written & quoted all the Truth here. I have always believed that about the bride: The Lamb's Wife. Blessings & His peace be with you, brother. BG
The imagery and symbolism of marriage is applied to Christ and the body of believers known as the church. These are those who have trusted in Jesus Christ as their personal savior and have received eternal life. In the New Testament, Christ, the Bridegroom, has sacrificially and lovingly chosen the church to be His bride (Ephesians 5:25-27). Just as there was a betrothal period in biblical times during which the bride and groom were separated until the wedding, so is the bride of Christ separate from her Bridegroom during the church age. Her responsibility during the betrothal period is to be faithful to Him (2 Corinthians 11:2; Ephesians 5:24). At the Second Coming of Christ, the church will be united with the Bridegroom, the official "wedding ceremony" will take place and, with it, the eternal union of Christ and His bride will be actualized (Revelation 19:7-9; 21:1-2).
At that time, all believers will inhabit the heavenly city known as New Jerusalem, also called “the holy city” in Revelation 21:2 and 10. The New Jerusalem is not the church, but it takes on the church’s characteristics. In his vision of the end of the age, the Apostle John sees the city coming down from heaven adorned “as a bride,” meaning that the inhabitants of the city, the redeemed of the Lord, will be holy and pure, wearing white garments of holiness and righteousness. Some have misinterpreted verse 9 to mean the holy city is the bride of Christ, but that cannot be because Christ died for His people, not for a city. The city is called the bride because it encompasses all who are the bride, just as all the students of a school are sometimes called “the school.”
As believers in Jesus Christ, we who are the bride of Christ wait with great anticipation for the day when we will be united with our Bridegroom. Until then, we remain faithful to Him and say with all the redeemed of the Lord, “Come, Lord Jesus!” (Revelation 22:20).
Answer this question.... why would God marry only a city where there's no people in it? First, in Revelation 21:1,2 New Jerusalem is seen by John "prepared as a bride adorned for her husband." I would like to point out the word "as" which shows a relation without stating that New Jerusalem is the bride. If it were a metaphor it would be different. THE CHURCH IS SUPPOSE TO BE PARTAKERS IN CHRIST GLORY. The redeemed and holy Church, washed by the Savior's blood, and obedient to his will as a faithful bride to her husband, is the new Jerusalem. So the city doesnt deserve such an honor without the inhabitants. 21:2 And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem. The glorified and heavenly Church, pure and beautiful as a bride prepared for the bridegroom. This chapter presents a vision of the final condition of the redeemed and triumphant church. The vision points out the contrast between the beginning and the final condition of our race. The career of man began in a garden, the fitting home of a race few in numbers. It ends, as revealed by the prophet, in a city, the home where multitudes gather. Of this city Jerusalem was a type. The redeemed and holy Church, washed by the Savior's blood, and obedient to his will as a faithful bride to her husband, is the new Jerusalem.
Ok. It can be easy to understand how the church has come to see itself as the 'bride of Christ'.
However, what is being overlooked is that a covenant is not always a marriage. Yes, a marriage is a covenant relationship. But a covenant relationship is not always a marriage.
God made covenants with Noah and Abraham and others. These covenants required blood (as do the covenants of God).
There were covenant relationships between many men throughout history. Many times the names were merged as well as blood being shed between men because of different talents and occupations. This does not mean they were married. There are handshakes and there is the toasting of beverages and there is signatures, etc. One or all of these actions can be done to seal the covenant in agreement and loyalty between parties.
Marriage is instituted and recognized as a covenant relationship, but NOT THE ONLY covenant relationship. ALL covenant relationships require loyalty and dedication, not just marriage. Paul was looking for a way to help the church understand their covenant in 2 Cor. 11:2 and marriage was what he used to help the church understand a covenant relationship.
So it seems that marriage is born out of a covenant relationship. A covenant relationship is not born out of marriage.
We are definitely in a covenant relationship with Jesus Christ. No questions about that. But not necessarily a marriage covenant. It is the COVENANT that makes us committed and faithful to Him, not the promise of marrying Him. A covenant IS the MOST intimate of all relationships and it does not have to involve a marriage ceremony of husband and wife or bride and groom.
Ok .. scripture it is for you Joe..
John 3:29 "He that hath the bride is the bridegroom, but the friend of the bridegroom, which standeth and heareth him, rejoiceth greatly because of the bridegrooms voice..."
John the baptist considers himself a FRIEND or guest of the bridegroom, and not the bride.
"Now ye are the body of Christ, and members in particular." (1 Cor.12:27) We are the BODY OF CHRIST.
Mar 2:19 Jesus replied, "Can wedding guests fast while the groom is still with them? As long as they have the groom with them, they cannot fast. Even Jesus says we are the wedding guests (friends) of the bridegroom.
And what about Matthew 22:1-13? Isn't this a parable about Jesus coming to offer salvation to the Jews? And they rejected His invitation, therefore He has called the gentiles as guests to the wedding? And doesn't Revelation 19:7-9 invite guests to the wedding of the marriage of the lamb? Are brides invited (guests)to their wedding? No, the guests are the invited.
Rev. 21:9 And there came unto me one of the seven angels which had the seven vials full of the seven last plagues, and talked with me, saying, Come hither, I will shew thee the bride, the Lamb's wife.
Rev. 21:10 And he carried me away in the spirit to a great and high mountain, and shewed me that great city, the holy Jerusalem, descending out of heaven from God...
Scripture CLEARLY states that the bride is the New Jerusalem.
And concerning the parable of the ten virgins. Nowhere does the bible state that the virgins are to marry the bridegroom. Nowhere. These virgins are probably guests.
Rev. 19:8 "Let us rejoice and be glad and give the glory to Him, for the marriage of the Lamb [Jesus] has come and His bride has made herself ready." It was given to her to clothe herself in fine linen, bright and clean; for the fine linen is the righteous acts of the saints. Notice .. the righteous acts of the saints .. not the saints themselves.
And what about Matthew 22:29&30? Isn't the Christian the resurrected that is spoken of here that will not marry?
John 3:29... john rejoiced of course. I never said john was the bride. Two things Christ pleads in defence of their not fasting.
1. That it was not a season proper for that duty (v. 15): Can the children of the bride-chamber mourn, as long as the bridegroom is with them? Observe, Christ's answer is so framed, as that it might sufficiently justify the practice of his own disciples, and yet not condemn the institution of John, or the practice of his disciples. When the Pharisees fomented this dispute, they hoped Christ would cast blame, either on his own disciples, or on John's, but he did neither. Note, When at any time we are unjustly censured, our care must be only to clear ourselves, not to recriminate, or throw dirt upon others; and such a variety may there be of circumstances, as may justify us in our practice, without condemning those that practise otherwise.
Now his argument is taken from the common usage of joy and rejoicing during the continuance of marriage solemnities; when all instances of melancholy and sorrow are looked upon as improper and absurd, as it was at Samson's wedding, Judges 14:17. Now, (1.) The disciples of Christ were the children of the bride-chamber, invited to the wedding-feast, and welcome there; the disciples of the Pharisees were not so, but children of the bond-woman (Gal. 4:25, 31), continuing under a dispensation of darkness and terror. Note, The faithful followers of Christ, who have the Spirit of adoption, have a continual feast, while they who have the spirit of bondage and fear, cannot rejoice for joy, as other people, Hos. 9:1. (2.) The disciples of Christ had the bridegroom with them, which the disciples of John had not; their master was now cast into prison, and lay there in continual danger of his life, and therefore it was seasonable for them to fast often. Such a day would come upon the disciples of Christ, when the bridegroom should be taken from them, when they should be deprived of his bodily presence, and then should they fast. The thoughts of parting grieved them when he was going, Jn. 16:6. Tribulation and affliction befel them when he was gone, and gave them occasion of mourning and praying, that is, of religious fasting. Note, [1.] Jesus Christ is the Bridegroom of his Church, and his disciples are the children of the bride-chamber. Christ speaks of himself to John's disciples under this similitude, because that John had used it, when he called himself a friend of the bridegroom, Jn. 3:29. And if they would by this hint call to mind what their master then said, they would answer themselves. [2.] The condition of those who are the children of the bride-chamber is liable to many changes and alterations in this world; they sing of mercy and judgment. [3.] It is merry or melancholy with the children of the bride-chamber, according as they have more or less of the bridegroom's presence. When he is with them, the candle of God shines upon their head, and all is well; but when he is withdrawn, though but for a small moment, they are troubled, and walk heavily; the presence and nearness of the sun makes day and summer, his absence and distance, night and winter. Christ is all in all to the church's joy. [4.] Every duty is to be done in its proper season. See Eccles. 7:14; Jam. 5:13. There is a time to mourn and a time to laugh, to each of which we should accommodate ourselves, and bring forth fruit in due season. In fasts, regard is to be had to the methods of God's grace towards us; when he mourns to us, we must lament; and also to the dispensations of his providence concerning us; there are times when the Lord God calls to weeping and mourning; regard is likewise to be had to any special work before us, ch. 17:21; Acts 13:2.
Since my comments be ON topic why do you ease them? Its because they are the TRUTH. Why else would the poster of this site battle in the comments yet delete the comments that you dont agree with??? Let me post my comment and let the people decide. Im sure people have enough sense that they dont need you to make choices of what to believe. Even God gives free choice. As far as im concerned, your "HUBPAGE" is dead because you are BIAS
Rev 21:2 And I John saw the holy city, new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a bride adorned for her husband. PAY ATTENTION TO THE NEXT VERSE...
Rev 21:3 And I heard a great voice out of heaven saying, Behold, the tabernacle of God is with men, and he will dwell with them, and they shall be his people, and God himself shall be with them, and be their God. --- End of verse. Wow, did God change the subject or did someone just misunderstand what He just said? You see clearly within the context of a woman, the bride, a city being spoken of, God immediately starts talking about group of people being the temple of God. He calls this city the “tabernacle of God” within the context that this tabernacle is a group of people. You can clearly see the implied meaning of the symbolic city as being a group of people who God indwells spiritually. This is so significant that I cannot even begin tell you.
Furthermore, we are SAVED BY GRACE... but we must spiritually get ourselves ready. If we have hate in our hearts we are murderers by God's word. So we must repent for our sins(and ASK forgiveness). And repentance IS a change of mind. Now thats readiness. If you call that work so be it but its not manual labor to boast about. You speak of GRACE sooooo much but how many times do you speak of REPENTANCE...??? YOU DONT TIE IT IN.
I explained it already.... It is that God has two elect groups of individuals on this earth-Israel and the Church. Israel is the wife of Jehovah forever (Jeremiah 3:14; Hosea 2:19). The Church is the bride of Christ (Revelation 19:7). Romans 9 through 11 depict Israel's past (chapter 9), Israel's present (chapter 10), and Israel's future (chapter 11). During the Tribulation Hour, all Israel shall be saved (see Romans 11:26). The 144,000 Jewish evangelists (see Revelation 7:4-8) will proclaim the gospel of the kingdom to all the world (Matthew 24:14), and all Israel will accept Messiah (Christ) as Savior and King. Now these Israelites are the elect: "As touching the election, they are beloved for the fathers' sakes" (Romans 11:28). This solves the problem of Matthew 24:22, which states, "And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake [Israelites] those days shall be shortened."
Posttribulationists vehemently cry: "You see, the elect are present for the judgments of the Tribulation Hour." Not so! The fact is that Jehovah chose or elected Israel to be His wife, and Christ chose or elected His people to be His bride, and it is the Father's elect wife experiencing the judgments mentioned in Revelation chapters 6-18.
Concerning Israel, Deuteronomy 7:6 declares, "For thou art an holy people unto the lord thy God: the lord thy God hath chosen thee to be a special people unto himself, above all people that are upon the face of the earth." This promise is perpetual. "For the gifts and calling of God are without repentance [or change of mind]" (Romans 11:29). This is the reason that all Israel is going to be saved (v. 26). God keeps His covenants (v. 27), and Israelites are still the Father's "election" (see v. 28).
To the Christians, Christ says, "Ye have not chosen me, but I have chosen you" (John 15:16). We were chosen "before the foundation of the world" (Ephesians 1:4), and our choosing is eternal. Now there is no difficulty whatsoever when men see both elections, but confusion reigns when the two are intermingled, spiritualized, allegorized, and symbolized. Take God for what He states-literally-and the problems vanish.
How created this doctrine you have?
Why is the word Lamb instead of Jesus? explain. Jesus is the "Lamb" or you could say referred as the "Lamb" because he died for sins. Why not Jesus wife?? Lamb was put there for a reason. The lamb takes away sins. So the "Lamb" marrying a city doesnt sit well with me. The Lamb/Jesus died for the church of believers.
God divorced Israel. So did he divorced the land and if so why?
The terms the bride, wife, body of Christ and the church are all interchangeable! The marriage supper (Rev.19:7-9/21:2,9) is for the Lamb's wife.(the Bride) We are called a chaste virgin. (2 Cor. 11:2) To say that we are not "the Bride" is to "strain at a gnat and swallow a camel" Mt.23:24 Doug Lamb
I find your hub and research on this subject of great interest having thought along similar lines myself. Wouldn't the body of Christ have part in the marriage as the bridegroom not the bride also. I had also thought of Israel also as being the bride. Your point that it is the New Jerusalem is also a possibility. It always troubled me that the body of Christ would also be the bride of Christ.
Good hub well thought out and researched
This has been very edifying. I agree, we are not the "bride"! I thank JESUS for His sacrifice, that I(we) am purified through His righteous Blood. Revelation 21 verses 9-10 clearly depict the Holy City New Jerusalem as the "LAMB'S Wife". All other teaching stretches, adds to or takes from, what the Word of GOD says. Also, remember we are all representing our LORD and Savior JESUS, so lets be at peace. We aren't supposed to be debating the Word of GOD anyway.
why is it so hard to see the lamb the groom and his bride being a new city "Jerusalem".
In Genesis God Yahweh the father begot Adam with the bride "the Garden of Eden".
You may have overlooked it, but it right there...so now in the end (Revelation)a city may seem a little crazy and wrong that the lamb is going to marry a city Jerusalem.
The doctrine of grace that we have to do nothing I cant agree with this because of Phil 3.14. Also read Phil 2.12I believe that Jesus gives us the grace to serve him but we must have the attributes of Christ.Then we must do somthing why would all of these scriptures say to him that overcometh,Rev 2-7 2-17 2-26 3-5 3-12 3-21 21-7 also read what Paul wrote 1 Cor 9-27 . We must eat the whole book it will be sweet in your mouth but bitter in your belly. You must change and not be the same old slob you were born,Born in sin shapen in iniquity. Hope these scriptures help God bless
i think a good thing to keep in mind through all of this is that God is preeminent to us. when we think of God's nature, his role, our role, we must not use our understanding to define these before we consider that God's relationship with man is always before man's to God. this is similar to the whole "does God have a gender" question. Scripture attributes fatherly and motherly qualities to God. Does this make Him male, female, transgender, or whatever? of course not! before there was male or female, there was God. we can't apply rules given to us to God, it's circular logic.
to clarify, i am NOT saying that God sins, does anything that if we were to do it would be sin but because it's God it's not sin, is male, female, both, neither, i'm really not making any claims, just trying to keep the perspective that God is preeminent.
much love.
Israel and the Church are on in the same. Israel represented the chosen people- set apart by God to be a witness to the world. It was through Israel that nations would know God. The Church is now 'Israel' We are chosen, set apart, to represent God to the world. It is our purpose to be salt and light...our purpose to bring out the God-colors in the world. The Church, just like Israel, is to make known the name of the Lord...I think we all have taken verses out of context- Rev. 21:9- the 'holy city of Jerusalem' refers to the new heaven. John is trying to convey that after Christ returns, God will make His dwelling among us. He will be in perfect relationship with us- His Church, His people, His Israel. Regardless of whether you see the Church as the bride or the body, its seeing it with value. For myself I like to consider the Church as the Bride, because its Christ is relationship. Its God chosing to be in union with us- the Church, his people. In Ephesians 5- Paul is trying to convey the holy union that is marriage- a precious relationship that needs tender, self-sacrificing care. So if some need to understand the importance and holiness of being in precious relationship with Christ by see the Bride as Christ, so be it. If in Rev. John is refering to the Bride as the new heaven so be it- its all about relationship! Christ and the Church, God and the Church in the new heaven (Holy Jerusalem) The point is that we are striving to live holy as God is holy- not through acts or deeds, but through personal, precious, self-sacrificing relationship with God our creator and taking that to the nations so that they too can experience that relationship. Regardless of how we interpret scripture, one thing is clear- Love the Lord with all your heart, mind, and strength- and love your neighbor as yourself. The point is to love- to be in relationship... God in relationship with His people
I have heard from a certain teacher that those holding to "church as bride" doctrine will not be raptured because Jesus is coming for His body. This teacher says they will be left here during the tribulation. Do you see that in scripture as well, and if so could you tell me where? Also, this teacher is extremely staunch in her views... as we should be when we know something is true concerning God's Word. However, I'm a little perplexed by this teacher...she seems to have an extremely good knowledge of the Word of God, however she shows no signs of love. If you ask her questions and she feels you aren't agreeing with her she becomes impatient, unkind, touchy, resentful, and she speaks ill of almost every well known preacher...she says they all teach false doctrine as well as others like them. In fact, there isn't one that she said anything good about...they all have something wrong...I don't know where you could even go to church if you were to ask her and yet she seems to be extremely solid in her knowledge of the Word of God. How does someone get that type of revelation of God's Word and yet be so unloving toward people? I don't understand it.
Im glad you all take into account that the Bible wasn't actually put together till 300 years after the church was formed.
The phrase "the bride of Christ" is not in the Bible verbatim. It is in the Bible, though, and it is no figurative term for Jerusalem, either. Rev. 21 says the "new" Jerusalem will come from Heaven adorned for her husband. In this new city, God dwells among men with no tabernacle. There are only two instances where this occurs: when Jesus was among men and when God is in the church. The chapter goes on to describe that Christ makes all things new. There's the new Jerusalem (or we could easily say Christ's hometown, figuratively). Christ makes things new through the church whether it's our newness of life in the church through grace or whether it's the new home He's given us in the church (aka, His home, or New Jerusalem).
If it couldn't be said that this was the bride, the chapter goes on to be more specific. After Christ says who will no be allowed into this city, an angel offers John to look at "the wife of the Lamb" (or the bride of Christ). After a poetic description, it is given the same description in verse 22 as it has in verse 3, where the tabernacle or temple is not in this city, or , "the wife of the Lamb", "as a bride adorned for her husband."
It's strange to say that the church isn't the bride would be a strange fact to introduce into the Bible, given that the only way one can be cleansed is through the church as we enter it and surrender to God's will. It's the only way to be readied as the word describes. It can't be Jerulsalem, as the state God created as Israel is no longer in existence. We saw it in complete disarray and disrepair in all of the prophets through the new testament as the pharisees, sadducees and others tried to keep the old state's laws alive. It simply isn't a valid argument nor is it a ploy by some religious org. such as the Catholic group.
The phrase the bride of Christ is no inferrence, it's the phrse used. The church in Isaiah 58 is the daughter of Zion, not by birth as we see in Revelation, but by marriage to the Lamb.
I believe that the bride preparing herself for the wedding is the act of sharing the Gospel and making new disciples. Then when the bride is ready (that is "when the fullness of the gentiles has come in")Jesus will return for His bride (the Church of true believers) who has been made spotless because she has the righteousness of Christ. We cannot make ourselves ready as individual brides, but by faithfully sharing the Gospel we can help to make the Church complete and therefore the "bride" ready.
I believe that an open mind must be attained whenever entering into a discussion. First and foremost, to deny fully that the church has any bride-like responsibilities is the deny Ephesians, whereby Christ is describe as the groom, inferring that we have some obligation to submit to christ, as a wife submits to her husband. This act of submitting is the reason for the church being described as the bride, not because we are necasarily litteraly the bride rather we must submit to Christ as a bride. In reference being ready, Jesus, when talking about the end times, is reffering to a thief in the night, and how we must "be ready". "Being Ready" does not mean doing deeds, it refers to the entering of a lov relationship with God, and the building of that relationship. It is therefore our duty to tell the world about such a relationship, so that they may also "be ready". Lastly, your aversion to good deeds contradicts to the very nature of faith. "Show me your faith without deeds and I will show you my faith through what I do" infers that they come hand in hand. Deeds do not save us, only faith, but having a genuine faith should enact us to do things, if we have a faith we should be doing things for God's Glory.
First, there is no such thing as a "doctrine" of the church as the bride of Christ. Just as there is no "doctrine" of Jesus as a vine, or bread, or a door. Still, these are metaphors that occur in scripture in order for us to fully understand what Christ, in His word want us to know.
I'm curious who you think, in your arrogance, it is incumbant upon to "prove" anything to you.
This blog is proof that any moron with a laptop can call himself a theologian.
Please disregard that last post. It was unkind and I regret it. Please forgive me.
After reading your above artical relating to The Bride of Christ, I have to addmit that I had to gave it a lot of thought. In all my years of bible study I believe too that the Bride of Christ is the Church. But now your artical above does give me a moment of pause. You do back up your claim in scripture.
I guess what I'm most surprised about is that you are correct in stating No where in that bible does it state Bride of Christ. This is truely an eye opener for me and helped reinforce my belief that religion in general is corrupted by satan. But I strongly believe in a relationship with God and our Lord Jesus Christ through His word the bible. I know I have received the Lord's Grace through Faith and without it we are all lost.
Through deep study and revelation through the Holiy Spirit, I have come to understand that to enter the Kindom of God you must have understanding of Grace through faith. As noted in Mathew 6:33 which states: Seek ye first the Kingdom of God and His rightisness...
I believe the fastest way to loose any chance of entering the Kingdom of God is to join any religion on earth.
To all who may read my comment I recommend you trust the word of God in your Holy Bible and only the Holiy bible.
Thank you (cdacoffee) for that small bite of light.
So where in the bible did you find that we don´t have to be baptized anymore?
I am sorry, maybe I should have explaned myself better, I have only recently started to read the Bible and I just wanted to ask you where in the Bible it is written that it is not necessary to be baptized for salvation.
kj, I am assuming you are directing your comment to me. Without stepping on any one's toes I would like to reply to your comment regarding Baptism.
First, I would recommend Baptism to anyone who has repented; has accepted Jesus Chirst as their saver and believes that Jesus Chirst is the son of God.
Second, You do not have to join a religion to be Baptised,and it still can be done. Most people believe that in order to be Baptised you have to be in some form of a Christian religion. If it is true that you have to be in a religion, then tell me what religion was John the Baptist. Baptism requires baptism in water and in the name of the Father (God), the Son (Jesus Christ) and the Holiy Spirit as noted in Mathew 28:19.
I also want to make one final point regarding Baptism. No one should think that a Baptism is a relationship to or a commitment to any particular christian religion. This is a mistake that far to many so called Christians make. Many believe their Baptism is into a particular christian religion and that is not true.
A true Baptism should happen only once in a person's life and should Baptism be done it should never be taken lightly. Baptiam is a step in your relationship with God and our Lord Jesus Christ.
But alway remmeber one thing, whether your Baptised or not, God will not pass judgement on your actions. His judgement will be decied on what is in your heart. That is why Grace through Faith is far more important than Baptism itself.
I recommend you read the Books of Romans and Hebrews in the NT. (You might want to read them more than once. Understanding these Books is not easy if you are new in reading the Bible. Trust in the Holiy Spirit, He will guide you through it, that is what He's for.
I wish you the best.
P.S. By the way, I was Baptised many years ago.
Thank you for you´re advice, you have taken away the doubts that I had regarding to getting Baptized. I will read the Books of Romans and Hebrews NT. And yes from what I had already read in the Bible I understand that the Bible is a book that you can best read several times in orde to really understand it.
kj, please read Titus 2.11 in your Bible regarding Salvation.
It states" For the Grace of God that brings salvation has appeared to all men." Titus 2:11.
I don't know - but I'm glad you're saved by God by Grace through Faith.
And I'm thankful to be a Church saint ... an "in Christ one"... Eph 2:7 that he (Father) might display in the coming ages (plural) the surpassing riches of his grace in kindness towards us IN Christ Jesus.
A common mistake people make is that they think God is treating all saints in God's program the same. We "in Christ ones" have a different content of salvation.
I don't know if the Church becomes the Bride but it is worth looking into now that you point it out. I thought Rev 19 was looking back at the point where the Church had been spoken clean in an utterance, by the Son (implying a grace gift)... not "made herself" ready (implying works). Anyway interesting post.
And the water baptism for salvation thread... if we have to do something other than the work of Christ to get saved or stay saved... someone better explain the cross.
1 Corinthians 15:1-4 is the specific ONLY gospel for salvation.
1) Christ died FOR OUR SINS, according to the Scriptures
Proof. He was buried
2) Christ rose again the third day, according to the scriptures.
Proof: He was seen by over 500, most of whom were alive at the writing of 1 Corinthians.
That is the single gospel, by which, anyone can be saved.
...unless you believe in vain... (eike = "without a reason/purpose")
The "reason/purpose" for which you believe that Christ died for our sins, was buried, and rose again ... is "for" salvation from the penalty of sins.
Believing anything else for salvation from the penalty of sins, adds to the work of Christ, and will prevent an individual's salvation, every time.
Thanks for your insight. Now I have something to look into! Cool post.
I came across your article a couple of days ago while doing a google search on the "Bride of Christ" and have read it and all of the ensuing comments with great interest. Thank you for your work and all the time you have spent replying to the comments. I have been challenged by what you have written, cdacoffee, and at the same time I think "thou dost protest TOO much".
I am sure there are some groups out there that use the concept of the "Bride of Christ" to justify their pushing good works as necessary for the second coming of Christ, but it appears to me that you are assuming that most of the church which believes they are the "Bride of Christ" are depending on their works to save them, that they have to DO something to get ready. Although I have accepted the bride of Christ concept for the majority of my Christian life (the better part of 40 years), I have never believed that there is anything I have to DO (as far as good works) to get myself ready for Christ's return except cooperate with Him as He saves, washes and sanctifies me. The righteousness that I possess is the righteousness of Christ, not my own (of which I have absolutely none). I am, however, responsible for "putting on Christ", putting on His robe of righteousness. This I DO by faith. It is an act of faith towards HIS grace. not my works. I think there is a distinction to be made between "an act/work of faith" and "works" when it coming to DOING something to being "made ready". Christ does not force us to be clothed with His righteousness, we must accept it willingly, putting it on, and in so doing, we are "doing" something, but this is not salvation by works. As an act of faith, it is not a dependence on our own righteousness that saves us, but a choosing. I PREPARE myself by CHOOSING to accept His righteousness and then His work of sanctification in me, but this act of choosing is not works, it is my faith in action.
After reading everything written here, I think Doug Lamb makes a good point in saying: "The terms the bride, wife, body of Christ and the church are all interchangeable! The marriage supper (Rev.19:7-9/21:2,9) is for the Lamb's wife.(the Bride) We are called a chaste virgin. (2 Cor. 11:2) To say that we are not "the Bride" is to "strain at a gnat and swallow a camel" Mt.23:24 Doug Lamb".
Scripture uses many different comparisons, similes, metaphors, etc. for both Israel in the OT(including a wife, and a harlot and a wild ass in heat in Jeremiah 2) and the church in the NT. By the way, I believe they are two different entities, which when Christ saves the remnant of Israel (along with those previously born again Jews), will be the one Wife, represented by the New Jerusalem which is inhabited by all of the Redeemed. The New Jerusalem is not only a place, but a place of the Redeemed. The term encompasses both, just as New York is both a location and the group of people residing in it.
The idea that Christ can't marry His own body is merely an assumption on your part. IT also cannot be proven by Scripture, so this is an argument from silence. Even the concept of "Christ's body" is a metaphor, for we are not literally Christ's body, we are His spiritual body. The Ephesians 5 passage says that marriage is a picture of Christ and the church (verse 32). The church as a body and Christ as its head, likewise, is only a picture of Christ and the church. We are given these pictures of what our relationship to Christ is to be like, but the one does not cancel out the other. It is not a question of "either/or" but of "both/and". Just because you accept the one, doesn't mean you have to reject the other. They are both just pictures of a spiritual relationship, and neither of them are perfect, but they do help us to understand.
When it comes to the creation account, God gave Eve to Adam, who was created out of Adam's OWN body, and then the two became ONE flesh again (not literally, although they reproduced to create one flesh). Likewise, the church exists because Christ layed down His life, sacrificing His own body for our redemption and creation. The church was born, or made out, of Christ's body in a spiritual sense. This idea that Christ cannot marry His own body is just as much of a stretch as saying that He can. In fact, the argument is irrelevant, because it is only symbolic either way you look at it. These are only earthly (and temporary) metaphors given to us for our spiritual understanding of things eternal which are unseen. They are different ways of understanding the different aspects of our relationship with Christ. In fact, I have no problem being known both as the body and bride of Christ. Both pictures exist in Scripture, even though the term "bride of Christ" may not exist as such.
I want to know why you use the "Abba, Father" argument against those who believe they are symbolically the Bride of Christ. This term is referring to our relationship with the Father and not with the Son and can just as easily be used to argue for what you are protesting about. I call my husband's father "Dad" because I am married to his son. My husband's father is not my spouse, he is my father (in law). My husband is my spouse and because of this relationship I have the privilege of calling his father "Dad". This does not mean I do not have a husband, and I do not call my husband "Dad" (although I realize there are wives that do this around their children, which I believe is to their own detriment because it creates confusion). The problem I have with you bringing this in is that it doesn't validate your argument. Just because Jesus is also called my "brother" which is makes God my Father, but it doesn't mean that I am divine also. That would be a stretch. Any comparative picture can be taken too far. And so can the picture of the bride of Christ. We must be careful not to do this, no matter what the picture is.
It seems to me that any picture of our relationship with Christ can be taken to the extreme. I have experienced an instance in what I considered to be a spiritually solid church in which, while referring to the body of Christ during a communion service, it was taken so literally that the focus was placed on the church body rather than on the Christ the head during the service, because they failed to acknowledge the the body is a picture of the church and not a literal part of Christ Himself. They changed the focus from Christ to the body, inferring that the body is Christ just as much as the Head is. This only happened once, but there is always this danger, no matter what the picture, and we must constantly be aware that these pictures are given only to help us understand a spiritual concept. Christ Himself must always be our focus, not the pictures which help us to understand the nature of our relationship.
On this basis, I will continue to consider myself a part of the Bride of Christ, "espoused" to my one Husband, and observe the symbol of this covenant in the "Lord's supper". I will continue to see Christ as my Savior, Redeemer and Brother, my Head, the Bread of Life and Living Water, the Vine, and all of the other pictures given to us in His Word. None of these are wrong. But we must remember it is Christ Himself that is important. I don't think it is necessary to create a doctrine around any of these pictures, either for or against. The doctrines about God as Creator, Christ's divinity and salvific work, justification by faith, the nature of Scripture, etc are those doctrines of which we depend on for our spiritual stability, not the various temporal pictures given to those who have already taken hold of salvation to help them understand the nature of a relationship with Christ they already possess by faith. We are not saved by our views on the timing of the rapture, the second coming or how we view our relationship with Christ (these pictures can all be applied, and some more so than others at various times in our lives). These may cause some spiritual confusion, and there is no reason to avoid discussing them, but this is not what determines where we will spend eternity.
I pray that we will be careful not to allow these types of issues to become
cdacoffee, maybe the following information will help settle this issue of the Bride of Christ is not the Church.
But before I lead into to it I think I should mention that I do understand why so many have argued this point. Ii wasn't until I read your artical a week or so ago that it help me to get a much better understanding on this issue. And I believe I am on a much better track.
In most of the parables that Jesus Chirst used in his teachings He discribes the Kingdom of God. This is why He mentions in Matthew 6:33 But Seek ye first the Kingdom of God and His Righteousness and all these things will be added to you. It is my believe that ihis is the most important statement in the entire bible. First, because He tells mankind what our primary focus should be which is the Kingdom and second, it's through righteousness we may enter his Kingdom. Although Jesus did not state the word Grace in this sentince, it is throught His Grace that we recieve His righteousness.
As Jesus died on the cross, He took whith Him the sins of all mankind. Not just some of us, not just for the believers, not just for the Jews, but for ALL mankind. In exchange for taking all our sins, He then extended or offered Grace to All mankind. It is from this point on we in the Christian faith begin to confuse things. Some who believe in Grace think that Grace alone is what saves us. That is only partly true. The rest if it is Grace through Faith. It states in Titus 2:11 For the Grace of God that brings salvation has appeared to all men. However, we must recieve his Grace by believing we recieved it ; this part is Faith.
I will use this example: I am standing in front of an audience of 25 people. I then reach into my pocket and take out 25 dollars in 1 dollar bills. This 25 dollars represents Grace. Now I tell the audience that I'm offering 1 dollar to all 25 persons. The audience is not sure what is going on and some don't care for the 1 dollar. However, 5 people in the audience believed that I would really give it to them so they stood up and came up to me and recieves from me 1 dollar each. This is faith. Now, I offered the dollar (Grace) to all 25 individuals but onty 5 believed (Faith) and recieved it. This is Grace though Faith. Grace is a Gift from God that has appeared to all men. I want to point out that faith is not works.
That is why you see in some of Jesus's parables toward the end where it say's "Many are called but few are chosen as in Matthew 20:16 and Matthew 22:20. In Matthew 22:2 where Jesus discribes the parable of The Kingdom of God is like a certain king who arranged a marriage for his son. The parable discribes a wedding taking place and guest are invited. But all who were initially invited (the Jews)for different reasons would not come. ( I don't believe that in this parable that Jesus was discribing the Bride of Christ) I believe what Jesus was trying to explaining in this parable is that the Wedding Garment was or is Grace through faith. Because He continues to discrbe inviting the bad and good (Gentiles)in verse 10 of the parable ( How can you invit the bad without Grace). Toward the end of the parable it is mentioned that a person who was present at the wedding who did not have a Wedding Garment. Again, I believe this wedding garment is Grace through Faith. Needless to say this man was not allowed to stay.
At the very end of this parable it is stated; For many are called, but few are chosen. Matthew 22:14.
I have noticed that some have used the parable I mentioned above to prove the bride of Christ issue. But, if one takes a look at the parable and see with their heart, they will see the Grace of God. Not the Bride of Christ as the church.
Note: Many are called(Grace), but few are chosen (Faith).
As christians, we should all come to understand an important point. Grace is what God shows towards man and Faith is what man shows towards God. So in the end we have Salvation.
To further my point I made 8 days ago in my comment regarding Grace through faith, I recommend reading Rev 17:14 which states, These shall make war with the LAMB, and the LAMB shall overcome them: for he is Lord of Lords, and King of Kings: and they that are with Him are Called, and Chosen; and Faithful.
Thank you cdacoffee
Thank you for this teaching. My husband and I read it together. Very insightful. We tend to agree with your understanding.
read 2 corinthians 11:2 paul was concerned with presenting the church of Corinth to one husband and that is Christ, as a pure virgin. you see the only ting the church as to do to get ready is to believe until the end. in contrast to being a seed planted in bad soil. As john said they went our from us to prove they never belonged to us. As it says in Romans 8 that the world is groaning waiting for the sons of God to be revealed. So the teaching of the Church as the bride of Christ doesn't change the fact that we are saved by grace through faith in the person and work of Christ.
It makes me wonder why there are those of us who believe in the unity of the body of Christ, but will be the first to stand there to argue and debate the word of God amoung each other. Think about it.
Shouldn't that give us all a moment of pause.
If we truely want answers to the many mysteries in God's word wouldn't it first be best for all of us to seek the wisdom and understanding of His word through the gift of the Holy Spirit. Unity in the body of Christ can not be maintianed through arguements and debates, but only through wisdom and understanding. Once we have accomplished this, then we have true unity. Because until this happens, it won't matter if we are the Bride of Christ or not.
I am a Christian. I am a child of God. I am a son of God. Jesus was the firstborn among many brothers. I am one of those brothers. God is my father. I am part of the body of Christ. I am an heir of God and a joint heir of Christ Jesus. One day I will enter into the bride with Christ. Yes, I will enter into the Kingdom of Heaven with Jesus. So shall I ever be with the Lord.
ELR, I did read the link you refered to regarding Mr. Ariel Fruchtenbaum. I will not argue or debate the bride of Chirst issue. But I will make this one comment. The word of God goes far deeper any even he realizes. Because if he had understood Rev 20: 5-10 he would have never written that link. And if you understood Rev 20:5-10 you would know what I mean. His position as scholar, auther, speaker, etc hold no value to me. And I could care less.
The problem we have as christian today is that to many believe that the word of God is left to ones interpretation and this was never intended to be the case. Read 2 Peter 1:20 which states: knowing this first, that no prophecy of Scripture is of any private interpretation.
We need to understand God's word, not interpretate it.
And that is the problem we have today in the christian faith, the lack of understanding. When you begin to see and hear with your heart, then you will begain to understand. And that this the problem Mr. Arnold Fruchtenbaum has.
As I stated in my earler comment, wisdom and understanding of God's word can only come through the gift of the Holy Spirit.
Interpretation will always leave room for error, understanding does not.
I wish to make one more point regarding Mr. Ariel Fruchtenbaum's link where he stands on the bride of Christ issue. And I do beleive that every one in this Hub has failed to mention. There has already been a large resurrection of the saints immedately following the resurrection of Jesus Christ almost 2000 years ago. If you don't believe me then read Matthew 27:52,53 which states:
and the graves were opened: and many of the saints who have fallen asleep were reaised: and coming out of there graves after His resurrection, they went into the holy city and appeared to many.
So please, if you can, tell me where do you think they fit in to the Bride of Christ plan.
Even Mr. Fruchtenbaum in his link makes no mention of these people. And yet these people who had died and are SAINTS are mentioned in God's Word. Also note that no where else in the bible are they mentioned.
Why this has never been brought up before is unknown to me. It seems to me that this fact is something that mainstream christians ignore or don't care. Or it's not brought up at the pulpit because it don't fit their doctrine.
We need to understand.
I wish to correct my above comment were I quoted Matthew 27:52,53 it states in the NKJV:
and the graves were opened;and many bodies of the saints who had fallen asleep were raised: and coming out of graves after His resurrection, they went into the holy city and appeared to many.
I should also clairify something else I wrote " Also note that no where else in the bible are they mentioned" (want to add) that I'm aware of at this time. It could be through more study that there is new revelation that I am not yet aware of.
If we are the bride of Christ, than we have no right to use the name of Jesus.
But, because WE ARE the body of Christ, we are allowed to used that powerfull name!
But because WE ARE the body of Christ, we are allowed to use that powerfull name.
By the way:
The body of Christ is always mentioned male and multiple, the bride of the Lamb is always female and singular.
God's holy Word, the bible, this one of the greates gift's that mankind has ever received. And yet, of all the books printed by man, it is the bible that is the least understood. And yet it has been sold more than any other book on earth. The bible tell mankind our history and our future. It is God's revelation to mankind of his Kingdom.
If we see and hear with our heart it will reveal to us the main subject of this book is His Kingdom from the beginning of Genesis to the last words of Revelations. And between it's pages it also contains some of the greates mysteries on earth. Mysteries that many of us try to explain or understand.
Because this book has been passed on to us through God's Holy Spirit, it is safe to assume that it will take true spiritual wisdom to understand what God wants revealed to us.
What is clear to me is that for whatever reason humanity plays an important role in God's Kingdom. For reasons only He knows, we will share that Kingdom.
Those of us who read the pages of His Word are searching for asnwers to questions that can not be found anywhere else. In many case's God's Word seems to causes more questions than they seem to answers. As a result we lose focus of the main subject of the bible which is God's Kingdom. And we begin to focus on the questions that we seek answers too.
I beleive the main purpose of Juses Christ's ministery on earth was and is to re-adjust our focus back to the Kingdom of God. Not to argue over issues like the Bride of Christ, 144,000, the Antichrist, the Two Witnesses, the Raptrue or anything else. That is not to say that we should not seek answers to these questions. But in doing so we should not lose focus on His Kingdom. And it is possible to do both.
In the ministery of Juses Christ, his primary focus at that time was the Kingdom of God and His Righteouness.... as we find in Matthew 6:33. He wants mankind to shift our sights back to the Kingdom which is the main subject of God's Word.
What I have discovered during my studies and revelations received through the Holy Spirit, is that as you begin to understand the Kingdom of God and His Grace, you will begin to understand why there is a Old and New Testiment. And the part each plays in God's Kingdom. And the book of Revelation becomes much more clear to us.
The bible has made it very clear the importants God has placed on the human heart. And how much understanding of God's Word is depended on it. Without it we will never know the Kingdom of God.
Once a person opens his heart to the Word of God he or she will receive understanding.
For those of us who our new in the Word, I believe the best way to explain bible understanding or revelation through the Holy Spirit is to put it this way:
To know, without knowing how or why.
I'm so grateful to have found this hub article! I'm preparing to lead a study on the book of Revelation and have concluded a key to understanding it is knowing the Jewish marriage customs and who/what is Christ's bride in Rev 21:9. It clearly does not look to be the Church. When you remind us here of many passages and, in particular, Is. 62:1-4, this nails it for me that Zion/Jerusalem is God/Christ's bride. He is jealous over Jerusalem. Christ wept for her. So many things come together. Countries are punished with natural disasters even when they push to divide the city. It is the apple of God's eye. Clarifying this is what I think will clarify for me who the actual players are in the book of Revelation. Thanks *so* much for posting this!
Ixthus ..
Rev. 18:16 And saying, Alas, alas that great city, that was clothed in fine linen, and purple, and scarlet, and decked with gold, and precious stones, and pearls!
A city can put on the fine linen, as this verse clearly has shown.
And acts of righteousness can be legal or moral obligation that is fulfilled and it brings about social stability and peace.
CDA took nothing out of context. As a matter of fact, he has one of the most in-depth coverages of the Bible, concerning the Bride of Christ doctrine. And he has certainly done his best to 'rightly divide the Word of God', which is something absent from the bride of Christ doctrine that is being taught today.
I'm glad to see these further posts after mine above. I found out some more about the Jewish traditional customs which has now reversed my thoughts on who the bride of Christ actually is in Rev 19, and am glad to see these other posts countering my first one, and lxthus12's comments confirm this further with some excellent points. I was forgetting the first marriage covenant with God was broken (Heb 8:9), and the new covenant is one of the Spirit (Jer 31:31), which includes both Jew and Gentile believers who become the bride of the new covenant.
in Revelation 18:16 it is not the city that is clothed in fine linen but it is in reference to the people of the city whom God is charging with idolatry and every kind of immorality. And yes Ms Dee isaiah 54 says that God was a husband to Israel and in Jeremiah 3 God divorced Israel and took a new Bride and that is the Church. The city of New Jerusalem is the home of the new bride.
Right, and what, ixthus12, is to become of Israel? It too are brought to repentance, in the end, right? Do you think there scriptures say there is a separate, specific resurrection for newly repentant Israel? I've read that recently and am trying to find where in the scriptures they get that from.
Ms Dee
I am sure you will find some that will disagree with me, but the nation of Isreal will be resurrected. However not according to what most people think. If you read the book of Ezkiel Chapters 37, 38 and 39 you will see how it line up with Rev, 20: 5-10. Most believe that the Nation of Isreal will somehow be part of or related in some way with the first resurrection but that is not the case. The so called bride of Christ doctrine don't apply. After the so-called millinimum. In the second resurrection is where Ezkiel 37,38, 39 will take place. If you study it carefully you will see how it falls into place.
This also fits in with the Book of Daniel Chapters 9, 10, 11, and 12.
If you study also the parables in Matthew 19:30 and 20:1-16 where it states in verse 16: So the last will be frist and the frist last.
Jesus was refering to the Old Covenant (Nation of Isreal) and the New Covenant (Saints). This applies to the first and second resurrection.
Most mainstream christians believe the New Jerusalem will come down from heaven right after the Millinum. But that is not the case. Frist God will raise up the Nation of Isreal, they will live in peace for a time,but it will not last.
Following these events as noted in Rev 20:9-10 then God will set up his Throne to pass final judgement. Then after will the New Jerusalem come down from heaven in all it's glory as it is explained in Chapter 21 of Rev.
I wish you the best is your studies
Many may disagree with this, and I'm not her to argue the point. But I hope this will help you in you in your staudies of the book of Revelations.
Dear gracinus, I would like to see you write a hub on what you say is so clear. What I see as clear is just before God's wrath is poured out, 144,000 from the tribes of Israel will be sealed so not to be harmed and be redeemed from the earth and kept pure, to follow the Lamb wherever he goes. So maybe you can do write a hub about how this fits in?
Yes, there is Satan's final deception of the nations who are burnt before he is then thrown into the Lake of Fire all happening before the dead are judged and the new Jerusalem comes down from God. I do see that :). Thanks for your best wishes on my studies!
MS Dee
Thank you for your comment, but I have no interest of writing my own Hub. However, I will give you my best answer on the 144,000.
The 144,000 are only mentioned twice in the entire bible, both reference about them are located in the book of Revelations. The first time is in Rev 7:5-8 and the second time in Rev 14:1.
No where in the entire bible is there a direct statement that the 144,000 are saints. Where there is no doubt, God has identified them as special group of people from the twelve tribs of Isreal. And no doubt they will be in God's Kingdom.
Jesus Christ states in John 10:16, And other sheep I have who are not of this fold; them also I must bring and they will hear my voice; and there will be one flock and one shepherd.
I have no doubt that Jesus was tell the diciples that the 144,000 will be joined together with the saints. What Jesus does not reveal in the above verse is when this will accure. But this I do know, both Saints and the 144,000 will be in the New Jerusalem.
Many doctrines have built on who is the 144,000 and the simple fact is only God knows who each one are and when they are reserrected.
I would like to make one more off comment. If you take a very close look at something that most people pay no attention too. In Rev 20:12 God raises a group people from the dead and passes judgement. Then in Rev 20:13 God raises another group of people from the dead and passes judgement on them. These are two seperate resurrections and judgements. Most christians don't see this. But it's there.
It is for these and other reason why I believe cdscoffee is on the right track when he says The bride of Christ is not the Church. As I had mentioned in another comment in this Hub, then word of God goes far deeper than most christians realize.
My best wish to you MS Dee.
When Jesus says in Matthew 11:21 "Woe to you, Chorazin ! Woe to you, Bethsaida ! For if the miracles had occurred in Tyre and Sidon which occurred in you, they would have repented long ago in ? sackcloth and ashes . Was He speaking to cities or the people who live in them? Of course He was speaking to people. He was not pronouncing judgment on buildings, and stones and trees for not recognizing the coming of the Messiah, but against the people who live in those cities. Just like the new Jerusalem, Jesus is bringing down the city of His new bride. He is not marrying a city, but the people who will dwell in that city. For as you can see from Scripture that a reference to certain cities and towns were references to the people who live in the cities themselves.
To Ms. Dee I believe there is one resurrection of the just and one of the unjust. Acts 24:15. So I believe the Bible teaches that all Saints, Old Testament and New shall be resurrected. Whether this will be in one part or two the Scriptures do not tell us. But we do know from Romans 9-11. Israel, at least it's spiritual leaders and the nation as a whole, were cut off so the Gentiles could be grafted in by our God so that salvation would not be offered to Israel only but to the whole world, of which the Church is comprised of both Jew and Gentile.
lxthus12
I will mention thhis only once in this Hub, not just for your benifit but for any one who may read this. People can do what they want with it, so I will try to make it as clear as I can. Most Christions do not understand Rev 20:5-10 and how much impact it will have on the Nation of Isreal and the complete resurrection of Isreal. So I would ask that you read Ezekiel 37:38:39: and see how it fits into Rev 20:5-10 And it fits also in Daniel 9:10:11:12. The problem is most people are blinded by religion to see what I am talking about. There is a resurrection of the Saints before the so called millininum and another right after the millinimum for Isreal. The second resurrection will involve the entire nation of Isreal. Once this has taken it's course, Then there will be two more resurrections as noted in Rev: 20:12,13. I don't expect you to take my word for it, so I would encourge you and any reader of this comment to take the time to read it carefully. But before you do I would hope that you open you heart to the Lord and ask him for wisdom understanding each time before you start to read. This is something I do before my three hours of study EVERY DAY for the past 10 years. And I don't let religion get in my way. The Holy Spirit will guide you through it. There is far more involved regarding these resurrections than most christian seem to understand. For example there was a large resurrection of Saints immedately after Jesus Christ resurrection as mentioned in Matthew 27:52,25. No one seem to teach on that one. (I don't think you have any comment on that one do you? If you do I would like to hear it.) This is just a few of the reason why this bride of Christ doctrine is in error. And cdacoffee has spent so much time and effort trying to bring this to light. He has the courage to stand up against those who push a doctrine that is in error. He has my total support.
Christions need to understand God's word and not just interpretate it. Jesus Christ states in Matthew 13:14,15
And in them the prophecy is fulfiled which says: Hearing you will hear and shall not UNDERSTAND. And seeing you will see and not perceive; For the HEARTS of the people have grown dull. Their ears are hard of hearing, And their eyes they have closed, lest they should see with their eyes and hear with their ears, Lest they should UNDERSTAND with their HEARTS and turn, so that I may heal them.
In the verses I mention above Jesus was refering to a parable in which he was describs the Kingdom of God. Which is what the ENTIRE bible is all about.
Christions today are blinded and to focused by religion and the doctrine they teach. Christion today are spoon fed the bible by someone else and in doing so they have forgotton how to read and study the word of God for themselves. After stairing at the man (woman) behind the pulpit for an hour they go home feeling good that they've completed their christian duty for the week. I hope you are not one of these. And that you(and others) will take the time to study the references I made above.
I want you to know lxthus12 that I do not question your faith and love for the Lord. I'm sure you have much knowledge of God's word. But I can see just by your comments that you are member of some religion out there. And that fine with with me, your have that right.
One other thing, the part where the Nation of Isreal is cut off and the Gentiels are grafted on. The UNDERSTANDING of that is; The end of the old covenant and Christ death on the cross started the new covenant. The Nation of Isreal being cut off goes far deeper than you realise, Because Isreal will no longer be cut off when you understand Rev 20: 5-10. (Their resurrection)
In any case lxthus12, I do wish you the best.
Ms Dee, just looking at the Hebrews text 8:9. I have the Aramic English New Testament and it doesn't say that it was broken, it just says He rejected them, because they had not continued in His covenant.
Chapter 19 talks about a marriage: And after these things (woo-hoo)Babylon getting the heck beat our of her-that fake city that tried to be Jerusalem)I heard a great Alleluia; Salvation, and glory, and honor, and power, unto the Lord our God.:
They continue to say that true and righteous are His judgments for He had judged the great whore. . .
Then is heard a voice from the throne (v. 5) and then a voice of a great multitude praising God (v. 6)
Then the voices say, Let us be glad and rejoice, and give honor to Him, for the marriage of the Lamb is come, and His wife hath mader herself ready.
And to her it was granted that she should be arrayed in fine linen, clean and white: for the fine linen is the righteousness of the saints.
v. 9, And he saith unto me, Write, blessed are they which are called to the marriage supper of the Lamb. And he said unto me, These are the true sayings of God.
Who is the her in verse 8? The bride or they that were invited to the marriage supper?
I am thinking that the she is the bride and she is righteous, but she is Jerusalem, and versie 9 are those that are blessed to come to the marriage supper of the Lamb.
Thank you Brother! My brethren struggle with this doctrine all the time because they do not yield to the teaching that the bride is the City and not a people. Not only that but when you compared the Great Harlot of Revelation 17 you find out in verse 18 that the Harlot (woman) is the great city (prob. Rome). Grammatically, the bride can only be the New Jerusalem because of the context and the grammar in ch.19 and 21.
cdacoffee
I believe that in many of your comments you have made it very clear that the Bride of Christ doctrine is in error. And you have provided strong evidence in the New Testament scriptrues that support the argument that the Bride of Christ is not the church. Reqardless of your strong evidence supported by NT scriptrues, it seems to me that others will continue to use OT scriptrues in support of the Bride of Christ is the Church doctrine. What makes this most difficult is that the Book of Revelation does not make direct differances in Old Testament and New Testament prophecy. In order to understand both would require guidence from the Holy Spirit. Where the problem continues in the Book of Revelations is how people interprete this book as a whole. Many allow religon to(unknowingly) misguide them and interprete the Book of Revelations for them. And therefore you have doctrine that is in error. I myself do not have a 100% understanding of this book,but I will not allow religon to enterprete the bible for me.
Clearly, the old and new Testament should be treated seperate as we should the two Covenants.
As I'm sure you are aware there is a big difference between the old and new covenant. And there lies the problem for many people how they tend to over lap or combind these two covenants. I see no evidence within the Old Testament (Old Covenant)on how the Bride of Christ doctrine can be supported. I believe that you will continue to receive arguments for and against the Bride of Christ is not the Church for as long as people continue to combind the two Covenants and leave the bible for enterpretation. I have made my point in earlier comments that the bible was never intened to be enterpretated, but clearly we must receive understanding. And I believe there is a big difference between to two. When we enterprete scriptrue we leave room for mistakes. And this is why I believe that the Bride of Christ is the Church doctrine in in error. What many may believe to be understanding is in fact enterpretation. What also does not help is when religon enforces or provides this wrong doctrine to begin with.
I do support your points you've made in all of your comments on this issue, but I do wonder how long are you willing to repeat yourself to those who just don't seem to want to UNDERSTAND.
My best to you.
I think the Bride of Christ is not the Church a subject that will continue to be argued or debated until we are all blue in the face. But it is a subject that seems to be a major issue for many of us. I believe where we have a problem is not so much the Bride of Christ so much, but more of the idea what we define as CHURCH. I believe this word (Church) is very misused and is one of our greatest problems in the word of God.
The very first time the word church is mentioned in the bible is when Jesus is talking to Peter in Matthew 16:18 (NKJV) where Jesus states: And I also say to youPeter, and on this rock I will build My church, and the gates of Hades will not prevail against it.
Then Jesus continues in verse 19 where Jesus states: And I will give you the keys to the Kingdom of Heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and what ever you loose on earth will be losed in heaven.
I think for many, this is where the problem lies. The way christians associate the word CHURCH with the word KINGDOM. The last time the word Churches is used is again spoken by Jesus Christ in Revelations 22:16. (Read it for youself).
The word Kingdom has nothing to do with the word Church by definition. But it is based on the Church that Christ built, that those persons are and will be part of the Kingdom of God.
I believe the Kingdom of God needs to be more clearly understood. Because it does have an impact on the Bride of Christ issue.
God being the creater of all things seen and unseen without doubt makes Him king. Nothing is above God. Therefore His rulership as King is without question. What many don't realize or understand is that whatever God commands becomes LAW. A command from God should never be violated. In other words a Kings statement is a Command. If one does not follow through with a command from God, he/she voilates a LAW. Again, a Kings word is LAW. If we read Genesis 2:16,17 you will note that it says: And the Lord God COMMANDED the man, saying, "Of every tree of the garden you may freely eat; but of the tree of knowledge of good and evil you shall not eat; for in the day that you eat of it you shall surely die. Mankind has been living and dying ever since because is LAW.
Because God is King of all things he may and can establish LAW where and to whom He whats too. Which brings me to the Old Covenants which God established with the Nation of Isreal through Moses. The Old Covenant was CONDITIONAL which many fail to understand. I direct your attention to Exodus 19:5,6 where it states: Now therefore, IF (notice the word IF)you will indeed obey my voice (command)and keep my covenant, THEN you will be a special treasure to Me above all people; for all the earth is mine. 6) And you shall be to me a KINGDOM of priests and a holy nation.
What most don't understand is that the ENTIRE covenat became LAW. Not just the 10 Commandments, but the ENTIRE covenant. Because they were or became a KINGDOM and a KINGDOM must have LAWS. The Nation of Isreal did not become a CHURCH then and they are not a CHURCH now.
You will note that only LAW can enforce any covenant (Testament). Through time the nation of Isreal broke the Covenant God had with them (they broke the LAW). As a result of breaking God covenant, God divorced Mimself from the Nation of Isreal. Note: when one has a divorce it involves LAW.
God said he would make a new Covenant with the House of Isreal.This new Covenant (LAW) was established when our Lord Jesus Christ died on the cross.
Note the following passage in Matthew 28:18, 19, 20 which states:
And Jesus came and spoke to them, saying," And ALL AUTHORITY has been given to me in heaven and on earth. 19 Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and of the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to observe all things that I HAVE COMMANDED you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age".
In these verses Jesus informed the disciples that all authority (power) has been given to him. This makes Him King. (But not above God) Based on his kingship He is able to speake commands. Based on His death and resurrection the New Covenant (LAW) has been established. (Which is a new LAW)
Understanding that both the Old and New Covenants are both Laws, it helps to undersand God's Kingdom to have a better understanding of the Book of Revelations. And to understand that ANY command or commandment spoken by God and Jesus Christ is a LAW.
This is why mankind fall short if we want to enter God's Kingdom based on our own merits and without Christ as our saviour.
The Church that Jesus talked to Peter about, are those who Christ has identified as citizians of the Kingdom of God. That is what define church. The Church is not religion. Jesus never built a religion. Jesus built (identified)His citizians for the Kingdom of God.
To state that the 144,000 of the twelve tribes of Isreal are or make up the Church is not scriptual. And to say that they are the Bride of Christ is also not scriptual. The 144,000 are and always will be a part of God's Kingdom and never a or part of a church if the word church indicates or implies religion.
Most most of the comments noted before mine implies that the Bride of Chirst is the Church as a religion and it's their religion who are the elect or chosen ones. There doctrine then implies that their Church is the Bride of Christ. If this is the case then the why does Jesus state in Matthew 6:33 Seek ye first the Kingdom of God and all his righteosness... In His ministry Jesus never mentioned that His Church is or would be any religion.
One final point: The women described in Rev. 12 and Rev. 17 and 18 are not CHURCHES. They are KINGDOMS
lxthus12
First, I do not try and interpretate God word. A person will receive revelation and understandingGod through the Holy Spirit of God's word or he/she won't.
Second, regarding the Church as the "Called Out Ones. These "called out ones" ARE THOSE WHO ARE CITIZIANS OF GOD'S KINGDOM in case that wasn't clear to you.
Third, if revelation is given to someone through the Holy Spirit, how then can it be out of context.
Fourth, there are many revelations in the Book of Revelation. So peardon me for placing a S at the end.
This entire Bride of Christ is/is not the Church is a very good example of enterpretation vs. understanding. If people would just allow the Holy Spirit to truely guide them through God's word, then there would be nothing to argue or debate. There is no doubt that some are wrong and some are right on this issue and many others. The understanding of God's word will always be found in our hearts, because it's through our hearts that God speaks to us. And it's through the heart we receive understanding, not enterpretation.
God does use people like cdacoffe, who I believe is guided by the Holy Spirit, to bring to light true teachings and understanding, however it is also the responsibility of each of us who hear the word, and allow the Holy Spirit to determine if the teaching from cdacoffee (or anyone else) is right or wrong. If cdacoffe is wrong, the Holy Spirit will tell you. If cdacoffee is right, then the Holy Spirit will tell you. In my case I meditated on the word for a week or so after reading this HUB and asked for guidence from God on the Bride of Christ issue as cdacoffee explained through scriptrue. Once I received the answer in my heart, then I had no doubt that cdacoffee is right. So what it boils down to is this, that if God said it, then that settles it.
First of all revelation has been given to the people thst God called to write the Bible. If you have been given revelation then it needs to be included in the Bible. We, the Church, have been given illumination to understand God's word. Only prophets and revelators have been given revelation. No scripture is of private interpretation. We have been given God's Spirit to help us understand the revelation that has already been given among many other things according to John 16.
It is easy to take things out of context when you don't know the context. And not eveyone has been given the Spiritual gift of discernment, knowlege and teaching. Just read Romans 12 and 1Corinthians 12
No i don't believe i only have discernment. And it os the ability to ne able to distinguish what kind of spirit redides within a person. Whether it be evil or not. Resd 1Cor 2:14 and it tells us that a natural man, an unsaved person who doesn't have the Holy Spirit, can't understand God's word. He needs to hear the gospel and believe and be born again and recieve God's Spirit then he will be able to comprehend the Bible and grow. The word of God is a dtumbling block to the Jew, foolishness to the gentile, but to us who are saved it is the power of God.
I apologize if i worded things in an offensive way before, and will try, by the grace of God, to speak the truth in love.
Saved in Christ alone,
Anthony Jones
CDA, I want to say thank you so much for posting this. It helps me bring light to those who are being taught that we are "the new Jerusalem,or the bride" It states clearly several times we are the body. To me the body is a saved person, a christian. The bride is Israel. Along side of this is the teachings that we have to preach the word to all nations to prepare them for the return of Jesus. How can we do that now. From my understanding in Revelations when it speaks of the word being spread to all nations it is done near the end of the tribulation. After the rapture. The rapture is the spiritual return of Jesus to take the saved to Heaven. After this has happened some 3 and a half to 4 years into the tribulation the anti-christ will be shown and everyone will follow him until the end of the 7 yrs. when Jesus will return in flesh and that shall be the day of judgement for all. That is the shortened version, but in general thats what i understand and take from the bible. Alot of people bypass the rapture completely and say that the physical return of Jesus is the real rapture. Once again I would like to say thank you for posting this.
Thank you very much. I have been holding to this as the teaching that the Church is the bride of Christ keeps us from accomplishing what we need to accomplish as the Body of Christ and it diminishes the power and authority we have been given in Christ, by Christ. Again, thanks!!
Isn't the spiritual Jerusalem or new Jerusalem often a reference to the church?
A verse that may add support to the "Jerusalem is the Bride" point of view is Galatians 4:26.
Neither position seems totally convincing to me.
DaveNJ
I have read Galatians 4:26 as you had mentioned in your comment. I believe it's refering to the heavenly Jerusalem above as being the mother of us all. I don't think this supports the idea that the Church is the Bride of Christ or that the New Jerusalem is the church.
As cdacoffee has mentioned many times the Bride is the New Jerusalem as mentioned in Rev: 21: 9-10. There are many who imply that the church is or will become the New Jerusalem, but no where in the bible will you find this.
I believe that the word church is what it causing us most of our problems in th body of Christ. And in doing so we (christians) have built doctrines and many different religions as a result.
If one reads Matt. 16:18 thru 19 ,where Jesus is speaking, which states:
18 And I also say to you that you are Peter, and on this rock I will build My church, and the gates of Hades will not pervail agains it. 19 And I will give you the keys of the Kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth will be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth will be loosed in heaven.
With these words I believe what Jesus was explaining to Peter that from that point on Christ Jesus would begin identifing those who are citizen in the Kingdom of God.
If you will note in Phillippians 3: 20-21 it states:
For our citizenship IS IN HEAVEN, from which we also eagerly wait for the Savior, the Lord Jesus Ctrist,21 who will transform our lowly body, according to the workings by which He is anble even to subdue all things to Himself.
In these words you will note that it states: For our citizenship is in heaven. Those who are the church are citizen of the heavenly Kingdom.
Based on these words I believe those who are citizen are the Church. And have the Keys to the Kingdom of God as Jesus stated in Matthew. These Keys unlock the the mysteries of Grace through Faith, receiving the gift of the Holy Spirit, understanding of God's Kingdom along with many other mysteries.
If we come to understand that the church as a whole are those who are citizens,it will allow us to understand that the church are those who are citizen that will be in the new Jerusalem when it comes down from heaven.
Based on this I believe the body of Christ (church/citizens) will be with Christ and his bride the New Jerusalem once it comes down from heaven.
It must be understood that Christ Church is not a religion. And Jesus did not establish a religion. He establish His Church, which is not religion.
Even in the OT times, the nation of Isreal was not religion. They where a Kindom, the High Preist were those who were to enforce God's Law (Covenant). The Priest were not enforcing a religion, the were to enforce the Kingdom of Isreal's Laws given to them by God.
And still many believe that the Church (as a religion) is the Nation of Israel and the Bride of Christ.
The was a time in the OT (Covenant) when God was the Husband to Nation of Isreal. However it also explains in the OT the God divorced himself from Isreal due to her becoming a Harlot.
I am not implying that the Nation of Isreal will have no part in the New Jerusalem. As a matter of fact it is evident that a least (and more likely even more) who are the 144,000 will have a part in the New Jerusalem. But this does not mean they (church) are the Bride of Christ? No, I don't see anything in scriptrue that say they are.
I will close by asking this one question to anyone who can answer it. If the twevle Tribe's of Isreal is the Bride of Christ, then why is the tribe of Dan not part of the 144,000? Read Rev 7: 5 thru 9 and you will see the Tribe of Dan IS NOT listed.
cdacoffee
I hope the following will be understood by those who will take the time to read it with an open heart.
I believe this will help others to understand what you have tried so hard to explain that the Bride of Christ is not the church. I hope this will also re-enforce the understanding that there is nothing we can do to earn our way into God's Kingdon, but it's only by Grace through Faith. And that the parable of the Ten Virgins has nothing to do with the "Bride of Christ is the Church doctrine" many religions teach.
As you have mentioned in your Hub that many religion have used the parable of the Ten Virgins in Matthew 25:1 thru 13 to explain or that it is related to the Bride of Chirst is the Church. You explain that this parable is taken out of context, which I believe you are correct. I believe the following will explain this parable of the Ten Virgins that Jesus Christ used.
First , it is important to undersatnd that all mankind is under God's Grace which was given to us by Jesus through his death on the cross, which is clearly explained in Titus 2:11 which states: For the Grace of God that brings salvation has appeared to all men.
This verse above clearly states that Grace has been offered to all mankind. However to obtained salvation through Grace we must receive it by Faith. In other words Faith is the oil and Grace is the Lamp. One is not good without the other. They are the Lamp and Oil of our salvation.
Jesus used this parable of the Ten Virgins to explain this point of Grace through Faith.
Matthew 25: 1thru 13 states: Then the Kingdom of God shall be likened to ten virgins who took their lamps and went out to meet the Bridegroom. 2 Now five of them were wise, and five were foolish.3 Those who were foolish took their lamp and took no oil with them.,4 but the wise took oil in their vessels with their lamps.5 But while the Bridegroom was delayed, they all slumbered and slept.6 And at midnight a cry was heard; Behold, the Bridegroom is coming; go out and meet him! 7 Then all those virgins arose and trimmed their lamps. 8 And the foolish said to the wise, 'Give us some of your oil, for our lamps are going out.' 9 But the wise answered and said,'No, list these shall not be enough for us and you; but go rather to those who sale,and buy for yourselves.10 And while they went to buy, the Bridegroom came, and those who where ready went in with him to the wedding, and the door was shut.11 Afterward the other virgins came also, saying Lord, Lord, open to us.12 But he answered and said,'Assuredly, I say to you, I do not know you.' 13 Watch therefore, for you know neither the day nor the hour in which the Son of Man is coming.
What Jesus is saying is this:
There are ten virgins who have the knowledge of Grace which is represented by the Lamps, five of these virgins have Grace through Faith, which is represented by the extra oil vessels they brought with the Lamps.
The five foolish virgins have not the understanding of Faith (oil vessels) and it's relatioship with Grace (lamp). So they had only their lamps.
Jesus Christ is represented by the Bridegroom and the ten virgin knows his arrival is soon but the exact time is not known.
Suddenly, in the middle of the night the Bridegroom is returning, which represent Christ return to earth. Realizing there lamps (Grace was ending) were going out, the five foolish virgins learned from the five wise virgins they need more oil (faith) for their Lamps (Grace.)So they departed to find more oil. And all who were ready, already having Grace through Faith, were then received by Jesus Christ and leave. Those virgins who remained behind who had went and bought more oil missed their chance to go to the wedding and are now left behind. They allowed their lamps to go out. They had there chance of Grace through Faith and lost it.
When the five foolish virgins knocked on the door to be let in, Jesus told them " I don't know you" . Basicly He's saying it's to late. You had the chance to understand: In other words if you didn't understand Grace through Faith before I came, you won't get the chance after.
Had these five foolish virgins brought oil vessels with their lamps, then there would have been Ten wise Virgins at the wedding.
This is why Jesus said in Matthew 25:13 Watch therefore, for you know neither the day or the hour, in which the Son of Man is coming.
There has been so much arguing and debate relating to the Bride of Christ doctrine. If one reads and understand the minestry of Jesus they will see that most parables relate to the Kingdom of God. Nothing in the above parable relates to the Bride of Christ.
As cdacoffee has explained many times, there is nothing we can do to get ourselves ready. It through the blood of Christ that we are cleansed of our sins. His loving Grace (Lamp) has been given to us and if we are wise virgins we will have Faith (Oil).
Please read Ephesians 2:8 which states:
For by Grace you have been saved through Faith, and that not of yourselves, it is a gift of God, not of works, least anyone should boast.
To all who read this many blessing to you.
Thank you cdacoffee for your blessing.
Cdacoffee
I didn't say they had to be saved but that they could only know and speak the truth by the Holy Spirit. John chapter 14 and chapter 16. But even though they were not born again as we are in the New Testament time Abraham rejoiced to see Jesus' day and saw it and was glad. When Abraham died he went to paradise not torment. So did he belong to God? Yes! Was he saved in the future expectation of the Christ? Yes! Jesus said it as stated above. And you are still rationalizing and not listening to Scripture. A natural man recieves not the things of God because they are Spiritually appraised. As far as the Church not being the bride of Christ because you believe those who hold to that interpretation believe we are saved by good works is bogus as well. I believe we are born again only by the grace of God through faith in the person and work of Jesus our God and Savior and I believe the Church is the bride of Christ. The passage in Revelation that says the Bride must make herself ready is not referring to the Church earning her salvation but exercising faith in Jesus. The passage about the ten virgins is in reference to those being ready by being filled with the Spirit of God. It is common knowledge that oil is symbolic to the anointing of God's Spirit upon a person. Even in the Old Testament people were indwelt by the Spirit of God. That is how David could pray, "take not thy Spirit from me O' God" I have to go but I would very much like to discuss this with you further. If you would care to because I believe iron does sharpen iron and two brothers in the Lord could help each other grow in the grace and knowledge of our Lord Jesus!
This was real good, brother. Thank you for the time/effort that undoubtedly went into this piece. I derived much from it, and it has only made me more appreciative of the grace in which I, we, stand. Peace.
Good Morning! I did a personal study a few months ago on this subject..and I came up with the same conclusion as you...I was glad to come across your article this morning because "The Bride of Christ" doctrine has been taught greatly in the ministry I am associated with.. And I was looking to see if others had done the same study as I did, and if so what did they come up with...your article confirmed to me what was revealed to me in my study...what made me do this study was I question all things and I take nothing that man says at face value...only the word of God in context which is revealed by His Spirit...Thank You for sharing...Blessings!
Are you Brother cdacoffee?
Thank you for your scholarship on this matter.
In the O.T., God's people were the CHILDREN of Israel. In the N.T. we are SONS of God. (I capiitalized "SONS" for emphasis.)
In 2 Corinthians 11:2, the Apostle Paul wishes he could, but laments he cannot espouse the rebellious faction in the church at Corinth AS a chaste virgin to Christ. But Paul does not present anything to Christ - except himself a living sacrifice, just as any Christian should.
In Ephesians 5:27, "...that He might present to Himself a glorious Church, Which is His Body. NOWHERE, in Scripture does a man present his wife to himself. This goes all the way back to Genesis 2:22.
In Revelation 19:8, the bride is arrayed in fine linen clean & white, which is the righteouness of the saints. Which saints? ALL the saints of ALL the ages that are in heaven by the occasion of the Marriage Supper of the Lamb. And what are we told time after time? God is No Respecter of persons! So what makes anyone think that it's the Church that is the bride?
Jesus does not attend the Marriage Supper of the Lamb. He arrives in 19:11. In 19:14, the armies in heaven FOLLOWED Jesus upon white horses, "clothed in fine linen, white and clean" to go forth to judge and make war. Sound like a bride to you?
I have four Scripture passages that state the Church is Christ's Body of Which He is the Head: 1 Cor. 12:27; Ephesians 1:22-23; Colossians 1:18; & Colossians 1:24.
In Revelation 21:2, Christ's Bride comes down OUT of heaven FROM God - Jesus' Father (and my Father, too), prepared AS a bride adorned for HER husband. 21:9 "...Come hither, I will shew thee the Bride, the Lamb's wife." 21:10 "...and shewed me that great CITY, the HOLY JERUSALEM, descending OUT of heaven FROM God. 21:11 "Having the glory of God: and HER light was like..."
ALSO, the Apostle Paul assigned feminine gender to the "Jerusalem that is above" as being the mother of us all (Galatians 4:26).
Moreover, Jesus enlisted me to be a good soldier enduring hardness (2 Timothy 2:3-4). In Ephesians 6:11-17, Paul lists the armor and the weaponry, with which we are to "put on."
Jesus is my Brother: We have the same Father. Further, Jesus makes me a king and a priest.
I have written 60,000 words on this very topic - the point being to free the "traditional" thinking Christian, so he or she can be all he/she can be in Christ and for Him. Too many Christians are confused about being militant - but walking in love and in the Spirit - or about being bride-like.
Want to get more men active in churches, i.e. the Church? Stop telling them they will become brides, and will someday marry Jesus! Anyway, most men are sick and tired of hearing their wives, or women in the church, tell the men that they (the women) can't wait to be married to Jesus. It's sickening!
And always remember Paul's caveat in Colossians 2:8. Beware lest any man spoil you through philosophy and vain deceit, after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of this world, AND NOT AFTER CHRIST!!!
I've written enough for now.
Blessings, peace, and love in the joy and privilege of serving Jesus & testifying of Him!
RICH PRICKITT
Prophet/evangelist/teacher
Founder/Director - Body Building Ministries - Building the Body of Christ, SOULdier by SOULdier
NO! Israel is NOT the Bride of Christ. Israel was the people of God, the children of Israel. There are NO types of the Church in the OT.
In the NT, we are both the teknon AND huios sons of God. Jesus is our Brother: We have the same Father. We are heirs of God and joint heirs with Christ. I do not intend to give up my son-ship to become my Father's daughter-in-law.
Moreover, Jesus enlisted (chose) me to be a good soldier, enduring hardness. And, Jesus makes me a king and a priest.
Blessings, peace, and love in the joy and privilege of serving Jesus AND testifying of Him!
Rich Prickitt
Prophet/Evangelist/Teacher
This message is something that I have been in search of. I have been hearing for so long we are to get ready to be His bride and then that He had made us His son's and thought, this is just not clicking in my mind . Thank you for making this very clear and I am so glad to have run across this message. God bless you.
Do you Know Jean Shephard? I agree with you and have for many years. Was shown this teaching by Jean Shephard in Boise, Idaho.
God Bless
Hi, thanks for your article re the Bride of Christ. This was raised in our home group last night and we need to find answers. You may well be right and we may well need to add it to the list of false doctrine. I think the biggest deception by far is calling the Bible the Word of God when the Bible states so clearly that the Word became flesh. There is not one Scripture that supports calling the Bible the Word of God and doing so puts focus on the Scriptures instead of Christ.
To toddott
I just want to make a brief statement to toddtt comment.
There is no confirmed evidence in the Bible that states or supports the bride of Christ is the church doctrine. Over time religion has created this doctrine to support their idea that they are the select few "the Elect" to seperate themselves from other churches or Religions.
I firmly believe that the church are those who Christ has identified a citizens (elect) of the Kingdom of God. I also firmly believe that the word church, as mentioned in Matt. 16:18 (KJV) that is stated by Jesus in taken out of context by 99% of christian religion today.
Many out their wrongly identify the OT Isreal as the church or a least assocate church with the 144,000. And that they are the bride of Christ. And I should mention their is nothing in the bible to support that doctrine either.
As clearly stated in the Book of Reveltion, the Bride of Lamb (Jesus) is the New Jerusalem, which is clearly stated.(Which is the first time the word church is mention in the bible) How any religion can come up with something different is beyond me. Only false doctrine can slip in the idea that it is anything else.
It is evident to me that religion has and will continue to interpret the bible the way they see fit. And not take the time to understand God's meaning of his Word.
Many times cdacoffee has clearly stated Rev. 21:9 for all to see and yet the arguments contnues.
We should not allow any religion to interpret the bible for us. We should allow the Holy Spirit reveal understanding to us as we study God's word for ourselves.
Many blessing to you.
and to LES,
The Bible IS the WORD of God. The LOGOS. It is the Testimony of Christ. God is greater than a piece of flesh. He became man as the Word. The Bible is the testimony of all Christ is and why He came. To say that the "good news" is not also the Word is to have no basis for belief in Jesus or an authoritative document to stand firm in our faith. No one ever said the physical pages are the Word or Jesus. You can burn a Bible and it does nothing. The Word lives. The Holy Spirit testifies to us through the written word. Don't make an issue out of nothing. Believe in Christ. wait, how....by hearing His Word.
The bride of Christ is Jerusalem, as John Says. Note also that the Bride in 19, is also the Harlot in chapters 17, 18; which is the great city from chapter 11, 16, 17, and of course 18. And you will note that Jerusalem is the bride, literally and figuratively in the Old Testament. This also makes the best prophetic and Gospel sense.
1.The Bible is the Word of God
2. The fact that Jerusalem is both the Great City, the Woman, the Harlot, and the Bride testifies to the essence and supreme beauty of. . . Grace.
3. The prophecies simply tell us that Jerusalem would be as though the Lord had not rejected her. See Isaiah 54 and Zechariah 10:6.
4. the focus is not with the Bride is not, but who she is: She obviously is Jerusalem! How does she play into God's unfolding plan/prophecy for grace and world dominance, both in the Great Tribulation and in the Thousand year reign of Christ.
5. What is God's Plan for Jerusalem and Israel from Deuteronomy 32(also chapter 28-31).
I am telling you, this is great stuff, full of grace and the affirmation that the word of God is authoritative and and pivotal.
As a rookie, I'll say this: there is scripture to support both views, though I have my own which I won't get into. I see Satan getting involved with all the arguments and I don't see enough "false doctrine" for anyone here to go to hell for. I will ask this: is there anyone in the new Jerusalem right now other than God and Jesus? Are they even in it now or not until it comes down? We will see the true meaning in time and no one will care who is right or wrong. Let's all pray for the Apostate Church and for those who will may be susceptible. Let us all see the righteousness and love in our True God and Prince Jesus. In Jesus name, Amen.
I believe there is a lot of confusion in the Body of Christ regarding the Bride of Christ issue. As CDACOFFEE has mentioned time and again, the issue we do not need to "Making ourselves ready" as it relates to WORKS.
I believe one of the big problems we have in the Body of Christ is the understanding of the word WORKS as it relates in the OT and the NT. The word Works has a diffferent context in the OT than it does in the NT.
Works in the OT was focused more on the individual own effort and more self serving and through it have right standings with God. As opposed to the Works in the NT which is an individual who is more focused on the needs of others and gives of himself because of his love for God and his neighbor.
Many in the Body of Christ believe that OT Works still applies in the NT which is where the problem lies.
We can not get ourselves ready through OT works. Because we are already ready through the NT Works of Jesus Christ.
It is because of Grace through Faith that we demostraight our NT Works towards our fellow man and God throught love.
You are totally right,the church is not the Bride of Christ..we are the BODY of Christ..anyone with a little research,as you have done will see we can't be the Bride and the Body..God doesn't work like that.Thanks for your post.
Body of Christ is HE - Bride of Christ is she. Two different Gender.
cdacoffee:
Bible also says anyone who calls someone a "fool" is in danger of hell fire and "fool" means one who is now a believer of the word of God. Jesus said go ye into all the world and preach ye the gospel. He never said to call people fools. You are in danger of hell fire and puffed up and you need to repent
I think it would be note worthy to review Rev 22:17 which states:
17 And the Spirit and the BRIDE say; Come. And let him who hear say; Come. And let him who thrist come. Whoever desires, let him take water of life freely.
John wrote Revelation around 90 AD which was revealed to him by the Spirit. In the verse above it would indicate the New Jerusalem (Bride) is in heaven at the time of the writing of Revelation.
This would seem to me to rule out the bride of Christ is the church doctrine.
CDACOFFEE, I am very greatful for your Hub. God Bless.
so cdacoffee
im a little confused about a different doctrin after
reading your post.
"I agree. We should'nt continue to be "of the world" once we get saved. But still we can't be perfect."
this is your quote and then later
"We are perfect because we have been given the gift of righteousness. "
I think i agree that we are the body of christ.
and i know there is no sin in him so how can we be
his body and be sinfull at the same time?
Does Jesus righteousness make us perfect or not?
One thing I want to point out to you all is that The LORD did't die to save a city but a people for His name sake. Ou are making too big a deal out of this. We ate saved by God's grace through the person and work of Jesus Christ. Read 1Corinthians 1:30 and you will see that Jesus has become hat we could not; Jesus has become o us wisdom, righteousness, notification and redemption. So how could we, who are born again through Jesus, still sin and be born again? When we walk by the flesh and not by the Spirit. John says in his first Epistle, "I write these things unto you that you may not sin but if anyone does we have an advocate with the Father who is Jesus Christ the Righteous. We who are born again learn not to sin as we are taught not to by learning the word of God. Jesus says in Matthew 28, " make disciples and teach them to obey everything I say."
jb, I hope the following will hope answer your question relating to "We are made perfect because we have been given the gift of righteousness" and yet you wonder why we still sin and at the same time we are the body of Christ( not the bride of Christ).
I draw your attention to 1 Thessalonions 2:23 NKJV which states: 23 Now may the God of peace Himself sanctify you COMPLETLY; and may your Spirit, Soul and Body be preserved blamless at the coming of our Lord Jesus Christ.
In this verse above it clearly indicates there our three parts to each and every one of us. Spirit, Soul and Body. It is wrong to think that the Spirit and Soul is or means the same thing, it is not. The Soul part of us is are mind, emotions and will. The Soul and body is the carnal part of each of us. Carnal means what we can identfy through our 5 sences. What we see, hear, touch, smell and tast.
When we received Christ as our Savior, it is the spirit part of us that receives the Baptism of the Holy Spirit and it's the Spirit part of us that receives the richtiousness of Christ. And in our heart is where the spirit dwells. This is why God looks at our heart. The change in us does not come from outside in but from the inside out. As we study the word of God, the Holy Spirit reveals within us Knowledge and Wisdom of God and what He wants revealed to us.
The Carnal part of us is in constant conflict with the Spirit. Our mind and body will sin, but our Spirit is sealed with the baptism of the Holy Spirit and can not be corrupted. As our faith grows our soul begins to identify with the spirit part of us, the things we learn in the spirit part of us begins to draw our spirital to the physical. Our mind (Soul) wants to react to our spirit part of us within our heart. Our physical body will never on it own react or respone to our Spirit.
This is why we our a new creature or a new being. We becaome part of the body of Christ. We become a creature that never existed before.
This does not mean we will not commit acts of sin, because again the carnal mind (Soul) will alway be in conflict with the spirit part of us. The evil one still has power to influence our thoughs and our will. Yet our faith comes from the spirit part of us which is given to us from God which allow us to resist sin.
It is the Spirit part of us that is in the body of Christ,yet it is our body that remain carnal. But our Soul can act on what was learn from our spirit to influence our body. This is why we can not make ourself righteous based on our own efforts. This is why our Soul knows right and wrong.
Jesus Christ is the best example of this. His Spirit was in perfect harmony with his Soul and Body. The Holy Spirit dwelled in the heart of Jesus. This is why he never sin, this is why He never doubted, this is why He raised people from the dead, this is way He was able to heal the sick, this is why He could walk on water, this is why he was able to preach the Kingdom of God and Rightiousness. This is why He was perfect. And this is why He could not be conceived though a human father.
This is why we are perfect and righteous through our savior Jesus Christ. His Grace on us and our faith in him allows us to understand in our heart Spirit, Soul and Body. The Holy Spirit will guide our hearts. As we open our hearts (Spirit) to the Holy Spirit we will begin to see and hear.
The Body of Christ are those (our Spirits) who are the
citizens of the Kingdom of God. This should never be confused with the issue of the bride of Christ is the Church or is not the church. As CDACOFFEE has stated many times "We are already made Righteous through Jesus". If one understands that it's our Spirit part of us that is righteous, then it allows us to understand who we are in the BODY OF CHRIST.
I am curious what is your viewpoint is cda on the passage in Philippians 2:12. It says to continue to work out your salvation with fear and trembling... Paul is already speaking to the church of Christ, those who already professed Christ as their savoir. If you are uncomfortable with the word "work" or "to make one self ready", as with the theology of the bride of Christ...what would you say to those who stay stagnant in their relationship with Christ? They never grow, they never transform in becoming more like Christ. Would you disagree that it takes work to live out the Christian walk? That it comes effortlessly, its easy and doesn't have its seasons where it really requires work to stay on the straight and narrow path? In my personal experience there have been seasons where it required a tremendous amount of effort and work to kill the flesh daily and to stay on the straight and narrow and not give into temptation. I couldn't sit back in a lazy chair and hope to get through the season with freedom and victory unless I did my part. While Jesus did 99% of the work, He still needed me to do my part in order for the victory to come. I considered it work. It was difficult and painful to go through the refiners fire. While salvation is a one time experience and justifies us in the eyes of the Father, we are still going through the purification process as long as we live here on this earth. Jesus looks at us as the completed vessel but since we are still here on earth and going through the purification process we are not complete yet which is why we have to continue to work at our relationship with Jesus, dying to self, moving from glory to glory. Jesus called gideon a man of valuer but in reality he was far from that. Jesus saw gideon as the completed work and knew in gideons completed form he was strong so in order for gideon to transform into the man of strength jesus created him to be, he first had to call it out of him. Gideon then responded and did his part (the efforts and work) to then become the man of valuer God created him to be. Isn't it possible that Jesus is doing the same thing with the church/bride of christ. The church has not reached its completion yet. We are still going through the purification process but he is calling us pure and spotless because he knows the end result and is in love drawing that out of us as we continue to be faithful and obedient by putting our trust in him that he will complete the work he has started in us.
It is clear that you are very fearful of salvation by works. For over 2 years you have been fighting this battle and your emphasis that the church is NOT the bride is based upon the fact that you do not believe the church (Christians) need to do anything to get ready. Although, I also share your belief that salvation is by grace and grace alone, the idea that the bride does not have to do anything to get ready simply IS NOT scriptural.
What is abundantly clear in scripture is the indicative is married to the imperative. How'd you like that pun? In other words . . . We are righteous before God; and yet, we are to strive for righteousness. The apostle Paul clearly presents that one’s ability to act righteously (to do or get ready by us) is only possible because one’s character has been renewed prior to the action (done by God). For instance, in Romans 6:2 Paul writes, “How can we who died to sin still live in it?” We are dead to sin because of the work of God. There you go . . . GRACE. Then in the same chapter Paul says this, “Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal bodies, to make you obey their passions.” So, in only a few verses – we are told to DO something. Get ready.
You must be careful that just because you want to avoid legalism (works based salvation), you do not go down the path of antinomianism. The only reason the church can get ready is that God has given them the ability to be ready. Christ himself called his people, his church, and his bride to obey his commands. That’s doing something. We do something not in order to be saved, but because we re saved.























cdacoffee Hub Author 2 years ago
The concern I have is that the bride of Christ doctrine teaches us to get ourselves "ready" and to get ourselves where we are "without spot or blemish". The concern is the same one Paul had with the Galatians. They were going back to doing works to be righteous and ready and without blemish! Paul called them fools. Anybody who thinks he is not ready and is not already an overcomer is a fool. We overcome by the blood of the Lamb. That is the work Jesus did FOR us. We are already made righteous by the work Jesus did for us in administering grace to us and giving His righeousness to us. That makes us without spot or blemish and ready to go no matter where we are in our level of Christian spiritual maturity. You see the whole of the Pauline revelation is that we are made righteous in Christ. There is NOT anything we can do on our own or else we can boast in our own works...